Fernando SRE

Hybrid Cloud vs Multicloud which strategy is right for you

Cloud computing has been a game-changer, enabling businesses to scale, innovate, and deliver services at a pace once thought impossible. Most companies begin their journey with a single public cloud provider, which serves them well initially. But as a business grows and its needs become more complex, that single-cloud environment often starts to feel restrictive. The one-size-fits-all solution no longer fits.

This is the point at which organizations reach a critical crossroads. The path forward splits, leading toward two powerful strategies that promise greater flexibility, resilience, and freedom: Hybrid Cloud and Multicloud. Let’s unpack these two popular approaches to help you decide which journey is right for you.

When one Cloud is no longer enough

Before diving into definitions, it’s important to understand why businesses are looking beyond a single provider. This isn’t a trend driven by technology for technology’s sake; it’s a strategic evolution fueled by practical business needs.

The core drivers are often a desire for more control over sensitive data, the need to avoid being locked into a single vendor’s ecosystem, and the goal of building a more resilient infrastructure that can withstand outages. As your organization’s digital footprint expands, relying on one provider can feel like putting all your eggs in one basket, a risky proposition in today’s fast-paced digital economy.

Understanding your two main options

Once you’ve decided to expand your cloud strategy, you’ll encounter two primary models. While they sound similar, they solve different problems.

A Hybrid Cloud approach is like having a custom-built workshop at home for your most specialized, delicate work, while also renting a massive, fully-equipped industrial space for heavy-duty production. It’s a mixed computing environment that combines a private cloud (usually on-premises infrastructure you own and manage) with at least one public cloud (like AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud). The two environments are designed to work together, connected by technology that allows data and applications to be shared between them.

A Multicloud strategy, on the other hand, is like deciding to source ingredients for a gourmet meal from different specialty stores. You buy your bread from the best artisan bakery, your cheese from a dedicated fromagerie, and your vegetables from the local farmer’s market. This approach involves using services from multiple public cloud providers at the same time. The key difference is that these cloud environments don’t necessarily need to be integrated. You simply pick and choose the best service from each provider for a specific task.

The hybrid approach is a blend of control and scale

Opting for a hybrid model gives an organization a unique balance of ownership and outsourced power. It’s a popular choice for good reason, offering several distinct advantages.

Flexibility in workload placement

Hybrid setups allow you to run applications and store data in the most suitable location. For example, you can keep your highly sensitive customer database on your private, on-premises servers to meet strict compliance rules, while running your customer-facing web application in the public cloud to handle unpredictable traffic spikes. This ability to “burst” workloads into the public cloud during peak demand is a classic and powerful use case.

Regulatory compliance and security

For industries like finance, healthcare, and government, data sovereignty and privacy regulations (like GDPR or HIPAA) are non-negotiable. A hybrid cloud allows you to keep your most sensitive data within your own four walls, giving you complete control and making it easier to pass security audits. It’s the digital equivalent of keeping your most important documents in a personal safe rather than a rented storage unit.

Enhanced resilience

A well-designed hybrid model offers a robust disaster recovery solution. If your local infrastructure experiences an issue, you can failover critical operations to your public cloud provider, ensuring business continuity with minimal disruption.

However, this approach isn’t without its challenges. Managing and securing two distinct environments requires a more complex operational model and a skilled IT team. Building the “bridge” between the private and public clouds requires careful planning and the right tools to ensure seamless and secure communication.

The multicloud path to freedom and specialization

A multicloud strategy is fundamentally about choice and avoiding dependency. It’s for organizations that want to leverage the unique strengths of different providers without being tied to a single one.

Avoiding vendor lock-in

Dependency on a single provider can be risky. Prices can rise, service quality can decline, or the vendor’s strategic direction might no longer align with yours. Multicloud mitigates this risk. It’s like diversifying your financial investments instead of putting all your money into one stock. This freedom gives you negotiating power and the agility to adapt to market changes.

Access to best-of-breed services

Each cloud provider excels in different areas. AWS is renowned for its mature and extensive set of services, Google Cloud is a leader in data analytics and machine learning, and Azure offers seamless integration with Microsoft’s enterprise software ecosystem. A multicloud strategy allows you to use Google’s AI tools for one project, Azure’s Active Directory for identity management, and AWS’s S3 for robust storage, all at the same time.

Improved global scalability

For businesses with a global user base, multicloud enables you to choose providers that have a strong presence in specific geographic regions. This can reduce latency and improve performance for your customers, while also helping you comply with local data residency laws.

The primary challenge of multicloud is managing the complexity. Each cloud has its own set of APIs, management tools, and security models. Without a unified management platform, your teams could find themselves juggling multiple control panels, leading to operational inefficiencies and potential security gaps. Cost management can also become tricky, requiring careful monitoring to avoid budget overruns.

How to chart your Cloud course

So, how do you decide which path to take? The right choice depends entirely on your organization’s specific circumstances. There is no single “best” answer. Ask yourself these key questions:

  • What are our business and regulatory needs? Do you handle data that is subject to strict residency or compliance laws? If so, a hybrid approach might be necessary to keep that data on-premises.
  • How do our legacy systems fit in? If you have significant investments in on-premises hardware or critical legacy applications that are difficult to move, a hybrid strategy can provide a bridge to the cloud without requiring a complete overhaul.
  • What is our team’s technical maturity? Is your team ready to handle the operational complexity of managing multiple cloud environments? A multicloud strategy requires a higher level of technical expertise and often relies on automation tools like Terraform or orchestration platforms like Kubernetes to be successful.

The road ahead

The lines between hybrid and multicloud are blurring. The future will see these strategies intersect even more with emerging technologies like AI-driven automation, which will simplify management, and edge computing, which will bring processing power even closer to where data is generated.

Ultimately, navigating your cloud journey isn’t about picking a predefined label. It’s about thoughtfully designing a strategy that aligns perfectly with your organization’s unique goals. By clearly understanding the strengths and challenges of each approach, you can build a cloud infrastructure that is strategic, efficient, and ready for the future.

July 15, 2025 by Cloud stuff DevOps stuff

The case of the missing EC2 public IP

It was a Tuesday. I did what I’ve done a thousand times: I logged into an Amazon EC2 instance using its public IP, a respectable 52.95.110.21. Routine stuff. Once inside, muscle memory took over, and I typed ip addr to see the network configuration.

And then I blinked.

inet 10.0.10.147/24.

I checked my terminal history. Yes, I had connected to 52.95.110.21. So, where did this 10.0.10.147 character come from? And more importantly, where on earth was the public IP I had just used? For a moment, I felt like a detective at a crime scene where the main evidence had vanished into thin air. I questioned my sanity, my career choice, and the very fabric of the TCP/IP stack.

Suppose you’ve ever felt this flicker of confusion, congratulations. You’ve just stumbled upon one of AWS’s most elegant sleights of hand. The truth is, the public IP doesn’t exist inside the instance. It’s a ghost. A label. A brilliant illusion.

Let’s put on our detective hats and solve this mystery.

Meet the real resident

Every EC2 instance, upon its creation, is handed a private IP address. Please think of this as its legal name, the one on its birth certificate. It’s the address it uses to talk to its neighbors within its cozy, gated community, the Virtual Private Cloud (VPC). This instance, 10.0.10.147, is perfectly happy using this address to get a cup of sugar from the database next door at 10.0.10.200. It’s private, it’s intimate, and frankly, it’s nobody else’s business.

The operating system itself, be it Ubuntu, Amazon Linux, or Windows, is blissfully unaware of any other identity. As far as it’s concerned, its name is 10.0.10.147, and that’s the end of the story. If you check its network configuration, that’s the only IP you’ll see.

# Check the network interface, see only the private IP
$ ip -4 addr show dev eth0 | grep inet
    inet 10.0.10.147/24 brd 10.0.10.255 scope global dynamic eth0

So, if the instance only knows its private name, how does it have a public life on the internet?

The master of disguise

The magic happens outside the instance, at the edge of your VPC. Think of the AWS Internet Gateway as a ridiculously efficient bouncer at an exclusive club. Your instance, wanting to go online, walks up to the bouncer and whispers, “Hey, I’m 10.0.10.147 And I need to fetch a cat picture from the internet.“

The bouncer nods, turns to the vast, chaotic world of the internet, and shouts, “HEY, TRAFFIC FOR 52.95.110.21, COME THIS WAY!”

This translation trick is called 1-to-1 Network Address Translation (NAT). The Internet Gateway maintains a secret map that links the public IP to the private IP. The public IP is just a mask, a public-facing persona. It never actually gets assigned to the instance’s network interface. It’s all handled by AWS behind the scenes, a performance so smooth you never even knew it was happening.

When your instance sends traffic out, the bouncer (Internet Gateway) swaps the private source IP for the public one. When return traffic comes back, the bouncer swaps it back. The instance is none the wiser. It lives its entire life thinking its name is 10.0.10.147, completely oblivious to its international fame as 52.95.110.21.

Interrogating the local gossip

So, the instance is clueless. But what if we, while inside, need to know its public identity? What if we need to confirm our instance’s public IP for a firewall rule somewhere else? We can’t just ask the operating system.

Fortunately, AWS provides a nosy neighbor for just this purpose: the Instance Metadata Service. This is a special, link-local address (169.254.169.254) that an instance can query to learn things about itself, things the operating system doesn’t know. It’s the local gossip line.

To get the public IP, you first have to get a temporary security token (because even gossip has standards these days), and then you can ask your question.

# First, grab a session token. This is good for 6 hours (21600 seconds).
$ TOKEN=$(curl -s -X PUT "http://169.254.169.254/latest/api/token" -H "X-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds: 21600")

# Now, use the token to ask for the public IP
$ curl -s -H "X-aws-ec2-metadata-token: $TOKEN" http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/public-ipv4
52.95.110.21

And there it is. The ghost in the machine, confirmed.

A detective’s field guide

Now that you’re in on the secret, you can avoid getting duped. Here are a few field notes to keep in your detective’s journal.

The clueless security guard. If you’re configuring a firewall inside your instance (like iptables or UFW), remember that it only knows the instance by its private IP. Don’t try to create a rule for your public IP; the firewall will just stare at you blankly. Always use the private IP for internal security configurations.

The persistent twin: What if you need a public IP that doesn’t change every time you stop and start your instance? That’s what an Elastic IP (EIP) is for. But don’t be fooled. An EIP is just a permanent public IP that you own. Behind the scenes, it works the same way: it’s a persistent mask mapped via NAT to your instance’s private IP. The instance remains just as gloriously ignorant as before.

The vanishing act. If you’re not using an Elastic IP, your instance’s public IP is ephemeral. It’s more like a hotel room number than a home address. Stop the instance, and it gives up the IP. Start it again, and it gets a brand new one. This is a classic “gotcha” that has broken countless DNS records and firewall rules.

The case is closed

So, the next time you log into an EC2 instance and see a private IP, don’t panic. You haven’t SSH’d into your smart fridge by mistake. You’re simply seeing the instance for who it truly is. The public IP was never missing; it was just a clever disguise, an elegant illusion managed by AWS so your instance can have a public life without ever having to deal with the paparazzi. The heavy lifting is done for you, leaving your instance to worry about more important things. Like serving those cat pictures.

July 12, 2025 by Cloud stuff

How Headless services and StatefulSets work together in Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open-source platform designed to seamlessly manage containerized applications. Imagine the manager at your favorite café coordinating baristas, chefs, and servers effortlessly, ensuring a smooth customer experience every single time. Kubernetes automates deployments, scaling, and operations, making it indispensable for today’s complex digital landscape.

Understanding headless services

At first glance, Headless Services might seem unusual, yet they’re essential Kubernetes components. Regular Kubernetes Services act as receptionists routing your calls; Headless Services, however, skip the receptionist altogether and connect you directly to individual pods via their unique IP addresses.

Consider them as a neighborhood directory listing direct phone numbers, eliminating the central switchboard. This direct approach is particularly beneficial when individual pod identity and communication are critical, such as with database clusters.

Example YAML for a headless service:

apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
  name: my-headless-service
spec:
  clusterIP: None
  selector:
    app: my-app
  ports:
  - port: 80

Demystifying StatefulSets

StatefulSets uniquely manage stateful applications by assigning each pod a stable identity and persistent storage. Imagine a classroom where each student (pod) has an assigned desk (storage) that remains consistent, no matter how often they come and go.

Comparing StatefulSets and deployments

Deployments are ideal for stateless applications, where each instance is interchangeable and can be replaced without affecting the overall system. StatefulSets, however, excel with stateful applications, ensuring pods have stable identities and persistent storage, perfect for databases and message queues.

Example YAML for a StatefulSet:

apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: StatefulSet
metadata:
  name: my-stateful-app
spec:
  serviceName: my-headless-service
  replicas: 3
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: my-app
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        app: my-app
    spec:
      containers:
      - name: app-container
        image: my-app-image
        ports:
        - containerPort: 80
        volumeMounts:
        - name: my-volume
          mountPath: /data
  volumeClaimTemplates:
  - metadata:
      name: my-volume
    spec:
      accessModes: ["ReadWriteOnce"]
      resources:
        requests:
          storage: 1Gi

The strength of pairing headless services with StatefulSets

Headless Services and StatefulSets each have significant strengths independently, but they truly shine when combined. Headless Services provide stable network identities for StatefulSet pods, akin to each member of a specialized team having their direct communication line for efficient collaboration.

Picture an emergency medical team; direct lines enable doctors and nurses to coordinate rapidly and precisely during critical situations. Similarly, distributed databases such as Cassandra or MongoDB rely heavily on this direct communication model to maintain data consistency and reliability.

Practical use-case

Consider a Cassandra database running on Kubernetes. StatefulSets ensure each Cassandra node has dedicated data storage and a unique identity. With Headless Services, these nodes communicate directly, consistently synchronizing data and ensuring seamless accessibility, irrespective of which node handles the incoming requests.

Concluding insights

Headless Services combined with StatefulSets form a powerful solution for managing stateful applications within Kubernetes. They address distinct challenges in state management and network stability, ensuring reliability and scalability for your applications.

Leveraging these Kubernetes capabilities equips your infrastructure for success, akin to empowering each team member with the necessary tools for clear communication and consistent performance. Embrace this dynamic duo for a more robust and efficient Kubernetes environment.

July 9, 2025 by Cloud stuff DevOps stuff Kubernetes SRE stuff

Choosing your message queue AWS SQS or GCP Pub/Sub

In the world of modern software, applications are rarely monolithic islands. Instead, they are bustling cities of interconnected services, each performing a specific job. For this city to function smoothly, its inhabitants, microservices, functions, and components need a reliable way to communicate without being directly tethered to one another. This is where message brokers come in, acting as the city’s postal service, ensuring that messages are delivered efficiently and reliably.

Two of the most prominent cloud-based postal services are Amazon Web Services’ Simple Queue Service (SQS) and Google Cloud’s Pub/Sub. Both are exceptional at what they do, but they operate on different philosophies. Understanding their unique characteristics is crucial for any cloud architect or DevOps engineer aiming to build robust, scalable, and event-driven systems. This guide will explore their differences to help you choose the right service for your application’s needs.

A quick look at our contenders

Before we examine the details, let’s get a general feel for each service.

AWS SQS is the seasoned veteran of message queuing. Think of it as a highly organized system of mailboxes. A service writes a letter (a message) and places it into a specific mailbox (a queue). The recipient service then comes to that mailbox and picks up its mail when it has the capacity to process it. It’s a straightforward, incredibly reliable system that has been battle-tested for years.

GCP Pub/Sub operates more like a global newspaper subscription. A publisher (your service) doesn’t send a message to a specific recipient. Instead, it publishes a message to a “topic,” like a news flash for the “user-signup” channel. Any service that has subscribed to that topic instantly receives a copy of the message. It’s designed for broad, real-time distribution of information on a global scale.

The delivery dilemma Push versus Pull

The most fundamental difference between SQS and Pub/Sub lies in how messages are delivered. This is often referred to as the “push vs. pull” model.

The pull model, which is SQS’s native approach, is like checking your P.O. box. The consumer application is responsible for periodically asking the queue, “Is there any mail for me?” This gives the consumer complete control over the rate of consumption. If it’s overwhelmed with work, it can slow down its requests or stop asking for new messages altogether. This is ideal for batch processing or any workload where you need to manage the processing pace carefully.

The push model, where Pub/Sub shines, is akin to home mail delivery. When a message is published, Pub/Sub actively “pushes” it to all subscribed endpoints, such as a serverless function or a webhook. The recipient doesn’t have to ask; the message just arrives. This is incredibly efficient for real-time notifications and event-driven workflows where immediate reaction is key. While Pub/Sub also supports a pull model, its architecture is optimized for push-based delivery.

Comparing key features

Let’s break down how these two services stack up in a few critical areas.

Message ordering

Sometimes, the sequence of events is just as important as the events themselves. For these cases, AWS SQS offers a specific FIFO (First-In, First-Out) queue type. This works exactly like a single-file line at a bank; the first person to get in line is the first one to be served. It provides a strict guarantee that messages will be processed in the exact order they were sent, which is critical for tasks like processing financial transactions or application logs.

GCP Pub/Sub, in contrast, does not have a dedicated FIFO queue type. Instead, it achieves partial ordering through the use of ordering keys. You can assign a key to messages (for example, a userId), and Pub/Sub will ensure that all messages with that specific key are delivered in order. However, it doesn’t guarantee order between different keys. To reuse the analogy, it’s less like a single line and more like a deli with separate ticket numbers for the butcher and the bakery. It keeps orders straight within each department, but not across the entire store.

Scale and reach

This is where their architectural differences become clear. SQS is a regional service. It’s incredibly scalable and resilient, but its scope is confined to a single AWS region.

Pub/Sub is inherently global. You publish a message once, and it can be delivered to subscribers in any region around the world with low latency. If your application has a global user base and you need to propagate events worldwide, Pub/Sub has a distinct advantage.

Message size and retention

Think of SQS as being for postcards and letters. It supports messages up to 256 KB. It can hold onto these messages for up to 14 days, giving your consumers plenty of time to process them.

Pub/Sub, on the other hand, can handle larger packages, with a maximum message size of 10 MB. However, its standard retention period is shorter, at 7 days.

Special delivery options

SQS has a native feature called Delay Queues. This allows you to postpone the delivery of a new message for up to 15 minutes. It’s like writing a post-dated check; the message sits in the queue but is invisible to consumers until the timer expires. This is useful for scheduling tasks without a complex scheduling service. Pub/Sub does not offer a similar built-in feature.

When to choose AWS SQS

SQS is your go-to choice when you need a dependable, orderly mailroom for your application. It excels in scenarios where:

  • Strict ordering is non-negotiable. For task sequencing or financial ledgers, SQS FIFO is the gold standard.
  • You need to control the pace of consumption. The pull model is perfect for decoupling a fast producer from a slower consumer or for batch processing jobs.
  • Task scheduling is required. The native delay queue feature is a simple yet powerful tool.
  • Your application’s architecture is primarily contained within a single AWS region.

When to choose GCP Pub/Sub

Pub/Sub is the right tool when you’re building a global broadcasting system or a highly reactive, event-driven platform. Consider it when:

  • You need to fan-out messages to many consumers. Pub/Sub’s topic-and-subscription model is designed for this.
  • Global distribution with low latency is a priority. Its global nature is a massive benefit for distributed systems.
  • You are sending large messages. The 10 MB limit offers much more flexibility than SQS.
  • A push-based model fits your architecture. It integrates seamlessly with serverless functions for instant, event-triggered execution.

A final word

So, after all this technical deliberation, which digital courier should you entrust with your precious data packets? The one that meticulously forms a single, orderly queue, or the one that shouts your message through a global megaphone to anyone who will listen?

The truth is, there’s no single “best” service. There’s only the one whose particular brand of crazy best matches your application’s personality. Is your app a stickler for the rules, demanding every event be processed in perfect sequence, lest it have a digital panic attack? Then the quiet, predictable, and slightly obsessive SQS is your soulmate. Or is your app more of a drama queen, needing to announce every minor update to the entire world, immediately? Then the boisterous, globe-trotting Pub/Sub is probably already sliding into your DMs.

Ultimately, the best way to choose is to put them to the test. Think of it as a job interview. Give them both a trial run with your actual workload and see which one handles the pressure with more grace, or at least breaks in a more interesting, less catastrophic way. Go on, do it for science. And for the future sanity of your on-call engineer.

July 6, 2025 by Cloud stuff

An irreverent tour of Linux disk space and RAM mysteries

Linux feels a lot like living in a loft apartment: the pipes are on display, every clank echoes, and when something leaks, you’re the first to squelch through the puddle. This guide hands you a mop, half a dozen snappy commands that expose where your disk space and memory have wandered off to, plus a couple of click‑friendly detours. Expect prose that winks, occasionally rolls its eyes, and never ever sounds like tax law.

Why checking disk and memory matters

Think of storage and RAM as the pantry and fridge in a shared flat. Ignore them for a week, and you end up with three half‑finished jars of salsa (log files) and leftovers from roommates long gone (orphaned kernels). A five‑minute audit every Friday spares you the frantic sprint for extra space, or worse, the freeze just before a production deploy.

Disk panic survival kit

Get the big picture fast

df is the bird’s‑eye drone shot of your mounted filesystems, everything lines up like contestants at a weigh‑in.

# Exclude temporary filesystems for clarity
$ df -hT -x tmpfs -x devtmpfs

-h prints friendly sizes, -T shows filesystem type, and the two -x flags hide the short‑lived stuff.

Zoom in on space hogs

du is your tape measure. Pair it with a little sort and head for instant gossip about the top offenders in any directory:

# Top 10 fattest directories under /var
$ sudo du -h --max-depth=1 /var 2>/dev/null | sort -hr | head -n 10

If /var/log looks like it skipped leg day and went straight for bulking season, you’ve found the culprit.

Bring in the interactive detective

When scrolling text gets dull, ncdu adds caffeine and colour:

# Install on most Debian‑based distros
$ sudo apt install ncdu

# Start at root (may take a minute)
$ sudo ncdu /

Navigate with the arrow keys, press d to delete, and feel the instant gratification of reclaiming gigabytes, the Marie Kondo of storage.

Visualise block devices

# Tree view of drives, partitions, and mount points
$ lsblk -o NAME,SIZE,FSTYPE,MOUNTPOINT --tree

Handy when that phantom 8 GB USB stick from last week still lurks in /media like an uninvited houseguest.

Memory and swap reality check

Check the ledger

The free command is a quick wallet peek, straightforward, and slightly judgemental:

$ free -h

Focus on the available column; that’s what you can still spend without the kernel reaching for its credit card (a.k.a. swap).

Real‑Time spy cam

# Refresh every two seconds, ordered by RAM gluttons
$ top -o %MEM

Prefer your monitoring colourful and charming? Try htop:

$ sudo apt install htop
$ htop

Use F6 to sort by RES (resident memory) and watch your browser tabs duke it out for supremacy.

Meet RAM’s couch‑surfing cousin

Swap steps in when RAM is full, think of it as sleeping on the living‑room sofa: doable, but slow and slightly undignified.

# Show active swap files or partitions
$ swapon --show

Seeing swap above 20 % during regular use? Either add RAM or conjure an emergency swap file:

$ sudo fallocate -l 2G /swapfile
$ sudo chmod 600 /swapfile
$ sudo mkswap /swapfile
$ sudo swapon /swapfile

Remember to append it to /etc/fstab so it survives a reboot.

Prefer clicking to typing

Yes, there’s a GUI for that. GNOME Disks and KSysGuard both display live graphs and won’t judge your typos. On Ubuntu, you can run:

$ sudo apt install gnome-disk-utility

Launch it from the menu and watch I/O spikes climb like toddlers on a sugar rush.

Quick reference cheat sheet

  1. Show all mounts minus temp stuff
    Command: df -hT -x tmpfs -x devtmpfs
    Memory aid: df = disk fly‑over
  2. Top ten heaviest directories
    Command: du -h –max-depth=1 /path | sort -hr | head
    Memory aid: du = directory weight
  3. Interactive cleanup
    Command: ncdu /
    Memory aid: ncdu = du after espresso
  4. Live RAM counter
    Command: free -h
    Memory aid: free = funds left
  5. Spot memory‑hogging apps
    Command: top -o %MEM
    Memory aid: top = talent show
  6. Swap usage
    Command: swapon –show
    Memory aid: swap on stage

Stick this list on your clipboard; your future self will thank you.

Wrapping up without a bow

You now own the detective kit for disk and memory mysteries, no cosmic metaphors, just straight talk with a wink. Run df -hT right now; if the numbers give you heartburn, take three deep breaths and start paging through ncdu. Storage leaks and RAM gluttons are inevitable, but letting them linger is optional.

Found an even better one‑liner? Drop it in the comments and make the rest of us look lazy. Until then, happy sleuthing, and may your logs stay trim and your swap forever bored.

July 4, 2025 by DevOps stuff Linux Stuff SRE stuff

Edge computing reshapes DevOps for the real-time era

A new frontier at your doorstep

When Amazon started placing delivery lockers in neighborhoods, packages arrived faster and more reliably. Edge computing follows a similar logic, bringing computational power closer to the user. Instead of sending data halfway around the world, edge computing processes it locally, dramatically reducing latency, enhancing privacy, and maintaining autonomy.

For DevOps teams, this shift isn’t trivial. Like switching from central mail hubs to neighborhood lockers, it demands new strategies and skills.

CI/CD faces a new reality

Classic cloud pipelines are centralized, much like a single distribution center. Edge computing flips that model upside-down, scattering deployments across numerous tiny locations. Deploying updates to thousands of edge devices isn’t the same as updating a handful of cloud servers.

DevOps teams now battle version drift, a scenario similar to managing software on thousands of smartphones with different versions. The solutions? Smaller, incremental updates and lightweight build artifacts, ensuring that pushing changes doesn’t overwhelm limited network bandwidth or hardware resources.

Designing for when things go dark

Planning a family dinner knowing there’s a possibility of a power outage means stocking up on candles and sandwiches. Similarly, edge devices must be designed for disconnection, ensuring operations continue uninterrupted during network downtime.

Offline-first architectures become critical here. Techniques like local queuing and eventual data reconciliation help edge applications function seamlessly, even if connectivity is lost for hours or days. Managing schema migrations carefully is crucial; it’s akin to updating recipes without knowing if family members received the memo.

Keeping data consistently in sync

Imagine organizing a city-wide neighborhood watch: push notifications ensure quick alerts, while pull mechanisms periodically fetch updates. Edge deployments use similar synchronization tactics.

Techniques such as Conflict-Free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs) help manage data consistency, even when devices are offline or slow to respond. DevOps engineers also need to factor in bandwidth budgeting, using intelligent compression and prioritizing data to ensure crucial information reaches its destination promptly.

Observability without seeing everything

Monitoring edge deployments is like managing a fleet of food trucks spread across the city. You can’t constantly keep an eye on every truck. Instead, you rely on periodic check-ins and key signals.

Telemetry sampling, data aggregation at the edge, and effective back-pressure management prevent network floods. Selecting a few meaningful metrics, like checking a truck’s gas gauge rather than tracking every sandwich sold, helps quickly pinpoint issues without drowning in data.

Incident response across the edge

Responding to issues at thousands of remote locations is challenging, like troubleshooting vending machines scattered nationwide without direct access.

Edge incident response leverages runbook templates, policy-as-code, and remote diagnostics tools. Because traditional SSH access isn’t always viable, tactics like automated self-healing and structured escalation paths blending central SRE teams with local staff become indispensable.

Bridging cloud and edge

Integrating IoT devices into your infrastructure is similar to securely registering visitors at a large event, you need clear identification, managed credentials, and accurate headcounts.

Edge computing uses secure onboarding, rotating credentials, and message brokers that maintain state coherence across the network. Digital twins represent device states virtually, helping maintain consistent and accurate information between edge and cloud environments. Cost-effective strategies determine whether workloads run locally or in centralized clouds.

Preparing for what’s next

Edge computing evolves rapidly, with emerging standards like WebAssembly (WASM) running applications directly at the edge, and maturing tools like OpenTelemetry simplifying observability.

DevOps teams should embrace these changes early. Developing skills in hardware awareness and basic radio frequency (RF) knowledge becomes increasingly valuable. Experimenting now, rigorously measuring results, and sharing insights ensures teams stay ahead.

Innovate and adapt for the road ahead

Edge computing is reshaping DevOps in real-time. Thriving in this era requires adapting practices, tooling, and mindset. Bring your computational lockers closer to home, plan proactively for network disruptions, streamline synchronization, enhance remote observability, and respond intelligently to incidents.

By preparing today, your DevOps team can confidently navigate tomorrow’s distributed landscape. Embracing edge computing means more than just keeping pace with technology; it positions your team to deliver faster, more reliable services, capitalize on emerging business opportunities, and maintain a competitive advantage. Investing now in the right tools, processes, and skills not only safeguards against future challenges but also unlocks potential for innovation, growth, and sustained success in a rapidly evolving technological world.

In short, the future belongs to those who embrace change and adapt quickly; let your team be among them.

July 3, 2025 by Cloud stuff DevOps stuff SRE stuff

Free that stuck Linux port and get on with your day

A rogue process squatting on port 8080 is the tech-equivalent of leaving your front-door key in the lock: nothing else gets in or out, and the neighbours start gossiping. Ports are exclusive party venues; one process per port, no exceptions. When an app crashes, restarts awkwardly, or you simply forget it’s still running, it grips that port like a toddler with the last cookie, triggering the dreaded “address already in use” error and freezing your deployment plans.

Below is a brisk, slightly irreverent field guide to evicting those squatters, gracefully when possible, forcefully when they ignore polite knocks, and automatically so you can get on with more interesting problems.

When ports act like gate crashers

Ports are finite. Your Linux box has 65535 of them, but every service worth its salt wants one of the “good seats” (80, 443, 5432…). Let a single zombie process linger, and you’ll be running deployment whack-a-mole all afternoon. Keeping ports free is therefore less superstition and more basic hygiene, like throwing out last night’s takeaway before the office starts to smell.

Spot the culprit

Before brandishing a digital axe, find out who is hogging the socket.

lsof, the bouncer with the clipboard

sudo lsof -Pn -iTCP:8080 -sTCP:LISTEN

lsof prints the PID, the user, and even whether our offender is IPv4 or IPv6. It’s as chatty as the security guard who tells you exactly which cousin tried to crash the wedding.

ss, the Formula 1 mechanic

Modern kernels prefer ss, it’s faster and less creaky than netstat.

sudo ss -lptn sport = :8080

fuser, the debt collector

When subtlety fails, fuser spells out which processes own the file or socket:

sudo fuser -v 8080/tcp

It displays the PID and the user, handy for blaming Dave from QA by name.

Tip: Add the -k flag to fuser to terminate offenders in one swoop, great for scripts, dangerous for fingers-on-keyboard humans.

Gentle persuasion first

A well-behaved process will exit graciously if you offer it a polite SIGTERM (15):

kill -15 3245     # give the app a chance to clean up

Think of it as tapping someone’s shoulder at closing time: “Finish your drink, mate.”

If it doesn’t listen, escalate to SIGINT (2), the Ctrl-C of signals, or SIGHUP (1) to make daemons reload configs without dying.

Bring out the big stick

Sometimes you need the digital equivalent of cutting the mains power. SIGKILL (9) is that guillotine:

kill -9 3245      # immediate, unsentimental termination

No cleanup, no goodbye note, just a corpse on the floor. Databases hate this, log files dislike it, and system-wide supervisors may auto-restart the process, so use sparingly.

One-liners for the impatient

sudo kill -9 $(sudo ss -lptn sport = :8080 | awk 'NR==2{split($NF,a,"pid=");split(a[2],b,",");print b[1]}')

Single line, single breath, done. It’s the Fast & Furious of port freeing, but remember: copy-paste speed correlates strongly with “oops-I-just-killed-production”.

Automate the cleanup

A pocket Bash script

#!/usr/bin/env bash
port=${1:-3000}
pid=$(ss -lptn "sport = :$port" | awk 'NR==2 {split($NF,a,"pid="); split(a[2],b,","); print b[1]}')

if [[ -n $pid ]]; then
  echo "Port $port is busy (PID $pid). Sending SIGTERM."
  kill -15 "$pid"
  sleep 2
  kill -0 "$pid" 2>/dev/null && echo "Still alive; escalating..." && kill -9 "$pid"
else
  echo "Port $port is already free."
fi

Drop it in ~/bin/freeport, mark executable, and call freeport 8080 before every dev run. Fewer keystrokes, fewer swearwords.

systemd, your tireless janitor

Create a watchdog service so the OS restarts your app only when it exits cleanly, not when you manually murder it:

[Unit]
Description=Watchdog for MyApp on 8080

[Service]
ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/myapp
Restart=on-failure
RestartPreventExitStatus=64   # don’t restart if we SIGKILLed

Enable with systemctl enable myapp.service, grab coffee, forget ports ever mattered.

Ansible for the herd

- name: Free port 8080 across dev boxes
  hosts: dev
  become: true
  tasks:
    - name: Terminate offender on 8080
      shell: |
        pid=$(ss -lptn 'sport = :8080' | awk 'NR==2{split($NF,a,"pid=");split(a[2],b,",");print b[1]}')
        [ -n "$pid" ] && kill -15 "$pid" || echo "Nothing to kill"

Run it before each CI deploy; your colleagues will assume you possess sorcery.

A few cautionary tales

  • Containers restart themselves. Kill a process inside Docker, and the orchestrator may spin it right back up. Either stop the container or adjust restart policies.
  • Dependency dominoes. Shooting a backend API can topple every microservice that chats to it. Check systemctl status or your Kubernetes liveness probes before opening fire .
  • Sudo isn’t seasoning. Use it only when the victim process belongs to another user. Over-salting scripts with sudo causes security heartburn.

Wrap-up

Freeing a port isn’t arcane black magic; it’s janitorial work that keeps your development velocity brisk and your ops team sane. Identify the squatter, ask it nicely to leave, evict it if it refuses, and automate the routine so you rarely have to think about it again. Got a port-conflict horror story involving 3 a.m. pager alerts and too much caffeine? Tell me in the comments, schadenfreude is a powerful teacher.

Now shut that laptop lid and actually get on with your day. The ports are free, and so are you.

June 28, 2025 by DevOps stuff Linux Stuff SRE stuff

Why Kubernetes Ingress feels outdated and Gateway API is stepping up

Kubernetes has transformed container orchestration, rapidly pushing the boundaries of scalability and flexibility. Yet some core components haven’t evolved as gracefully. Kubernetes Ingress is a prime example; it’s beginning to feel like using an old flip phone when everyone else has moved on to smartphones.

What’s driving this shift away from the once-reliable Ingress, and why are more Kubernetes professionals turning to Gateway API?

The rise and limits of Kubernetes Ingress

When Kubernetes introduced Ingress, its appeal lay in its simplicity. Its job was straightforward: route HTTP and HTTPS traffic into Kubernetes clusters predictably. Like traffic lights at a busy intersection, it provided clear and reliable outcomes: set paths and hostnames, and your Ingress controller (NGINX, Traefik, or others) took care of the rest.

However, as Kubernetes workloads grew more complex, this simplicity became restrictive. Teams began seeking advanced capabilities such as canary deployments, complex traffic management, support for additional protocols, and finer control. Unfortunately, Ingress remained static, forcing teams to rely on cumbersome vendor-specific customizations.

Why Ingress now feels outdated

Ingress still performs adequately, but managing it becomes increasingly cumbersome as complexity rises. It’s comparable to owning a reliable but outdated vehicle; it gets you to your destination but lacks modern conveniences. Here’s why Ingress feels out-of-date:

  • Limited protocol support – Only HTTP and HTTPS are supported natively. If your applications require gRPC, TCP, or UDP, you’re out of luck.
  • Vendor lock-in with annotations – Advanced routing features and authentication mechanisms often require vendor-specific annotations, locking you into particular solutions.
  • Rigid permission models – Managing shared control across multiple teams is complicated and inefficient, similar to having a single TV remote for an entire household.
  • No evolutionary path – Ingress will remain stable but static, unable to evolve as the Kubernetes ecosystem demands greater flexibility.

Gateway API offers a modern alternative

Gateway API isn’t merely an upgraded Ingress; it’s a fundamental rethink of how Kubernetes handles external traffic. It cleanly separates roles and responsibilities, streamlining interactions between network administrators, platform teams, and developers. Think of it as a well-run restaurant: chefs, managers, and servers each have clear roles, ensuring smooth and efficient operation.

Additionally, Gateway API supports multiple protocols, including gRPC, TCP, and UDP, natively. This eliminates reliance on awkward annotations and vendor lock-in, resembling an upgrade from single-purpose appliances to versatile multi-function tools that adapt smoothly to emerging needs.

When Gateway API becomes essential

Gateway API won’t suit every situation, but specific scenarios benefit from its use. Consider these questions:

  • Do your applications require sophisticated traffic handling, like canary deployments or traffic mirroring?
  • Are your services utilizing protocols beyond HTTP and HTTPS?
  • Is your Kubernetes cluster shared among multiple teams, each needing distinct control?
  • Do you seek portability across cloud providers and wish to avoid vendor lock-in?
  • Do you often desire modern features that are unavailable through traditional Ingress?

Answering “yes” to any of these indicates that Gateway API isn’t just helpful, it’s essential.

Deciding to move forward

Ingress isn’t entirely obsolete. For straightforward HTTP/HTTPS routing for smaller services, it remains effective. But as soon as your needs scale up, involve complex traffic management, or require clear team boundaries, Gateway API becomes the superior choice.

Technology continuously advances, and your infrastructure must evolve with it. Gateway API isn’t a futuristic solution; it’s already here, enhancing your Kubernetes deployments with greater intelligence, flexibility, and manageability.

When better tools appear, upgrading isn’t merely sensible, it’s crucial. Gateway API represents precisely this meaningful advancement, ensuring your Kubernetes environment remains robust, adaptable, and ready for whatever comes next.

June 26, 2025 by Cloud stuff DevOps stuff Kubernetes SRE stuff

Achieving perfect elasticity in Kubernetes with multidimensional autoscaling

Running a Kubernetes environment can feel like a high-stakes game of guesswork. We estimate our application’s needs, define our resource requests, and hope we’ve struck the right balance. Too generous, and we’re paying for cloud resources that sit idle. Too conservative, and we risk sluggish performance or critical outages when real-world demand spikes. It’s a constant, stressful effort to manually tune a system that is inherently dynamic.

There is, however, a more elegant path. It involves moving away from this static guesswork and towards building a truly adaptive infrastructure. This is not about simply adding more tools; it’s about creating a self-regulating system that breathes with the rhythm of your workload. This is the core promise of a well-orchestrated Kubernetes autoscaling strategy. Let’s explore how to build it, piece by piece.

The three pillars of autoscaling

To build our adaptive system, we need to understand its three fundamental components. Think of them as the different ways a professional restaurant kitchen responds to a dinner rush.

The Horizontal Pod Autoscaler HPA

When a flood of orders hits the kitchen, the head chef doesn’t ask each cook to work twice as fast. The first, most logical step is to bring more cooks to the line. This is precisely what the Horizontal Pod Autoscaler does. It acts as the kitchen’s manager, watching the incoming demand (typically CPU or memory usage). As orders pile up, it adds more identical pod replicas, more “cooks”, to handle the load. When the rush subsides, it sends some cooks home, ensuring you’re only paying for the staff you need. It’s the frontline response to fluctuating demand.

The Vertical Pod Autoscaler VPA

Now, consider a specialized station, like the grill. What if the single grill cook is overwhelmed, not by the number of orders, but because their workspace is too small and inefficient? Simply adding another grill cook might just create more chaos in a cramped space. The better solution is to give the specialist a bigger, better grill station. This is the domain of the Vertical Pod Autoscaler. The VPA doesn’t change the number of pods. Instead, it meticulously observes the real-world resource consumption of a single pod over time and adjusts its allocated CPU and memory, its “workspace”, to be the perfect size. It answers the question, “How much power does this one cook need to do their job perfectly?”

The Cluster Autoscaler CA

What happens if the kitchen runs out of physical space? You can’t add more cooks or bigger grills if there’s no room for them. This is where the Cluster Autoscaler comes in. It is the architect of the kitchen itself. The CA doesn’t pay attention to individual orders or cooks. Its sole focus is space. When it sees pods that can’t be scheduled because no node has enough capacity, our “cooks without a counter”, it expands the kitchen by adding new nodes to the cluster. Conversely, when it sees entire sections of the kitchen sitting empty for too long, it smartly downsizes the space to keep operational costs low.

From static blueprints to dynamic reality

When we first deploy an application on Kubernetes, we manually define its resources.requests, and resources.limits. This is like creating a static architectural blueprint for our kitchen. We draw the lines based on our best assumptions.

But a blueprint doesn’t capture the chaotic, dynamic flow of a real dinner service. An application’s actual needs are rarely static. This is where the VPA transforms our approach. It moves us from relying on a fixed blueprint to observing the kitchen’s real-time workflow. It provides the data-driven intelligence to continuously refine and optimize our initial design, shifting us from a world of reactive fixes to one of proactive optimization.

How a great platform elevates the craft

Anyone can assemble a kitchen, but the difference between a home setup and a Michelin-star facility lies in the integration, quality, and advanced tooling. In the Kubernetes world, this is the value a managed platform like Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) provides.

While HPA, VPA, and CA are open-source concepts, managing them yourself is like building and maintaining that professional kitchen from scratch. GKE offers them as fully managed, seamlessly integrated services.

  • Effortless setup. Enabling these autoscalers in GKE is a simple, declarative action, removing significant operational overhead.
  • An expert consultant, the VPA’s “recommendation-only” mode is a game-changer. It’s like having a master chef observe your kitchen and leave detailed notes on how to improve efficiency, all without interrupting service. This free, built-in guidance is invaluable for right-sizing your workloads.

However, GKE’s most significant innovation is a technique that solves a classic Kubernetes puzzle: The Multidimensional Pod Autoscaler (MPA).

Historically, trying to use HPA (more cooks) and VPA (better workspaces) on the same workload was a recipe for conflict. The two would issue contradictory signals, leading to instability. GKE’s MPA acts as the master head chef, intelligently coordinating both actions. It allows you to scale horizontally and vertically at the same time, ensuring your kitchen can both add more cooks and give them better equipment in one fluid motion. This is the ultimate expression of elasticity.

A practical blueprint for your strategy

With this understanding, you can now design a robust autoscaling strategy:

  • For Your Stateless Dishes (e.g., web frontends, APIs)
    Start with the HPA to handle variable traffic. As you mature, graduate to the MPA to achieve a superior level of efficiency by scaling in both dimensions.
  • For Your Stateful Specialties (e.g., databases, message queues)
    Rely on the VPA to meticulously right-size these critical components, ensuring they always have the exact resources needed for stable and reliable performance.
  • For the Entire Kitchen
    Let the Cluster Autoscaler work in the background as your ever-vigilant architect, always ensuring there is enough underlying infrastructure for your applications to thrive.

An autonomous future awaits

We started with a stressful guessing game and have arrived at the blueprint for an intelligent, self-regulating infrastructure. By thoughtfully combining HPA, VPA, and CA, we evolve from being reactive system administrators to proactive cloud architects.

This journey culminates with tools like GKE’s Multidimensional Pod Autoscaler. The MPA is more than just another feature; it represents a paradigm shift. It solves the fundamental conflict between scaling out and scaling up, allowing our applications to adapt with a new level of intelligence. With MPA, workloads can simultaneously handle sudden traffic surges by adding replicas, while continuously right-sizing the resource footprint of each instance. This dual-axis scaling eliminates the trade-offs we once had to make, unlocking a state of true, cost-effective elasticity.

The path to this autonomous state is an incremental one. The best first step is to harness the power of observation. Start today by enabling VPA in recommendation-only mode on a non-production workload. Listen to its insights, understand your application’s real needs, and use that data to transform your static blueprints. This is the foundational skill that will empower you to confidently adopt multidimensional scaling, creating a dynamic, living system ready to meet any challenge that comes its way.

June 21, 2025 by Cloud stuff DevOps stuff Kubernetes

Linux commands for the pathologically curious

We all get comfortable. We settle into our favorite chair, our favorite IDE, and our little corner of the Linux command line. We master ls, grep, and cd, and we walk around with the quiet confidence of someone who knows their way around. But the terminal isn’t a neat, modern condo; it’s a sprawling, old mansion filled with secret passages, dusty attics, and bizarre little tools left behind by generations of developers.

Most people stick to the main hallways, completely unaware of the weird, wonderful, and handy commands hiding just behind the wallpaper. These aren’t your everyday tools. These are the secret agents, the oddballs, and the unsung heroes of your operating system. Let’s meet a few of them.

The textual anarchists

Some commands don’t just process text; they delight in mangling it in beautiful and chaotic ways.

First, meet rev, the command-line equivalent of a party trick that turns out to be surprisingly useful. It takes whatever you give it and spits it out backward.

echo "desserts" | rev

This, of course, returns stressed. Coincidence? The terminal thinks not. At first glance, you might dismiss it as a tool for a nerdy poetry slam. But the next time you’re faced with a bizarrely reversed data string from some ancient legacy system, you’ll be typing rev and looking like a wizard.

If rev is a neat trick, shuf is its chaotic cousin. This command takes the lines in your file and shuffles them into a completely random order.

# Create a file with a few choices
echo -e "Order Pizza\nDeploy to Production\nTake a Nap" > decisions.txt

# Let the terminal decide your fate
shuf -n 1 decisions.txt

Why would you want to do this? Maybe you need to randomize a playlist, test an algorithm, or run a lottery for who has to fix the next production bug. shuf is an agent of chaos, and sometimes, chaos is exactly what you need.

Then there’s tac, which is cat spelled backward for a very good reason. While the ever-reliable cat shows you a file from top to bottom, tac shows it to you from bottom to top. This might sound trivial, but anyone who has ever tried to read a massive log file will see the genius.

# Instantly see the last 5 errors in a huge log file
tac /var/log/syslog | grep -i "error" | head -n 5

This lets you get straight to the juicy, most recent details without an eternity of scrolling.

The obsessive organizers

After all that chaos, you might need a little order. The terminal has a few neat freaks ready to help.

The nl command is like cat’s older, more sophisticated cousin who insists on numbering everything. It adds formatted line numbers to a file, turning a simple text document into something that looks official.

# Add line numbers to a script
nl backup_script.sh

Now you can professionally refer to “the critical bug on line 73” during your next code review.

But for true organizational bliss, there’s column. This magnificent tool takes messy, delimited text and formats it into beautiful, perfectly aligned columns.

# Let's say you have a file 'users.csv' like this:
# Name,Role,Location
# Alice,Dev,Remote
# Bob,Sysadmin,Office

cat users.csv | column -t -s,

This command transforms your comma-vomit into a table fit for a king. It’s so satisfying it should be prescribed as a form of therapy.

The tireless workers

Next, we have the commands that just do their job, repeatedly and without complaint.

In the entire universe of Linux, there is no command more agreeable than yes. Its sole purpose in life is to output a string over and over until you tell it to stop.

# Automate the confirmation for a script that keeps asking
yes | sudo apt install my-awesome-package

This is the digital equivalent of nodding along until the installation is complete. It is the ultimate tool for the lazy, the efficient, and the slightly tyrannical system administrator.

If yes is the eternal optimist, watch is the eternal observer. This command executes another program periodically, showing its output in real time.

# Monitor the number of established network connections every 2 seconds
watch -n 2 "ss -t | grep ESTAB | wc -l"

It turns your terminal into a live dashboard. It’s the command-line equivalent of binge-watching your system’s health, and it’s just as addictive.

For an even nosier observer, try dstat. It’s the town gossip of your system, an all-in-one tool that reports on everything from CPU stats to disk I/O.

# Get a running commentary of your system's vitals
dstat -tcnmd

This gives you a timestamped report on cpu, network, disk, and memory usage. It’s like top and iostat had a baby and it came out with a Ph.D. in system performance.

The specialized professionals

Finally, we have the specialists, the commands built for one hyper-specific and crucial job.

The look command is a dictionary search on steroids. It performs a lightning-fast search on a sorted file and prints every line that starts with your string.

# Find all words in the dictionary starting with 'compu'
look compu /usr/share/dict/words

It’s the hyper-efficient librarian who finds “computer,” “computation,” and “compulsion” before you’ve even finished your thought.

For more complex relationships, comm acts as a file comparison counselor. It takes two sorted files and tells you which lines are unique to each and which they share.

# File 1: developers.txt (sorted)
# alice
# bob
# charlie

# File 2: admins.txt (sorted)
# alice
# david
# eve

# See who is just a dev, just an admin, or both
comm developers.txt admins.txt

Perfect for figuring out who has access to what, or who is on both teams and thus doing twice the work.

The desire to procrastinate productively is a noble one, and Linux is here to help. Meet at. This command lets you schedule a job to run once at a specific time.

# Schedule a server reboot for 3 AM tomorrow.
# After hitting enter, you type the command(s) and press Ctrl+D.
at 3:00am tomorrow
reboot
^D (Ctrl+D)

Now you can go to sleep and let your past self handle the dirty work. It’s time travel for the command line.

And for the true control freak, there’s chrt. This command manipulates the real-time scheduling priority of a process. In simple terms, you can tell the kernel that your program is a VIP.

# Run a high-priority data processing script
sudo chrt -f 99 ./process_critical_data.sh

This tells the kernel, “Out of the way, peasants! This script is more important than whatever else you were doing.” With great power comes great responsibility, so use it wisely.

Keep digging

So there you have it, a brief tour of the digital freak show lurking inside your Linux system. These commands are the strange souvenirs left behind by generations of programmers, each one a solution to a problem you probably never knew existed. Your terminal is a treasure chest, but it’s one where half the gold coins might just be cleverly painted bottle caps. Each of these tools walks the fine line between a stroke of genius and a cry for help. The fun part isn’t just memorizing them, but that sudden, glorious moment of realization when one of these oddballs becomes the only thing in the world that can save your day.

June 14, 2025 by DevOps stuff Linux Stuff
NivelEpsilon
Exploring the Cloud: Insights into DevOps, Linux & Architectural Evolution