Serverless

The slow unceremonious death of EC2 Autoscaling

Let’s pour one out for an old friend.

AWS recently announced a small, seemingly boring new feature for EC2 Auto Scaling: the ability to cancel a pending instance refresh. If you squinted, you might have missed it. It sounds like a minor quality-of-life update, something to make a sysadmin’s Tuesday slightly less terrible.

But this isn’t a feature. It’s a gold watch. It’s the pat on the back and the “thanks for your service” speech at the awkward retirement party.

The EC2 Auto Scaling Group (ASG), the bedrock of cloud elasticity, the one tool we all reflexively reached for, is being quietly put out to pasture.

No, AWS hasn’t officially killed it. You can still spin one up, just like you can still technically send a fax. AWS will happily support it. But its days as the default, go-to solution for modern workloads are decisively over. The battle for the future of scaling has ended, and the ASG wasn’t the winner. The new default is serverless containers, hyper-optimized Spot fleets, and platforms so abstract they’re practically invisible.

If you’re still building your infrastructure around the ASG, you’re building a brand-new house with plumbing from 1985. It’s time to talk about why our old friend is retiring and meet the eager new hires who are already measuring the drapes in its office.

So why is the ASG getting the boot?

We loved the ASG. It was a revolutionary idea. But like that one brilliant relative everyone dreads sitting next to at dinner, it was also exhausting. Its retirement was long overdue, and the reasons are the same frustrations we’ve all been quietly grumbling about into our coffee for years.

It promised automation but gave us chores

The ASG’s sales pitch was simple: “I’ll handle the scaling!” But that promise came with a three-page, fine-print addendum of chores.

It was the operational overhead that killed us. We were promised a self-driving car and ended up with a stick-shift that required constant, neurotic supervision. We became part-time Launch Template librarians, meticulously versioning every tiny change. We became health-check philosophers, endlessly debating the finer points of ELB vs. EC2 health checks.

And then… the Lifecycle Hooks.

A “Lifecycle Hook” is a polite, clinical term for a Rube Goldberg machine of desperation. It’s a panic button that triggers a Lambda, which calls a Systems Manager script, which sends a carrier pigeon to… maybe… drain a connection pool before the instance is ruthlessly terminated. Trying to debug one at 3 AM was a rite of passage, a surefire way to lose precious engineering time and a little bit of your soul.

It moves at a glacial pace

The second nail in the coffin was its speed. Or rather, the complete lack of it.

The ASG scales at the speed of a full VM boot. In our world of spiky, unpredictable traffic, that’s an eternity. It’s like pre-heating a giant, industrial pizza oven for 45 minutes just to toast a single slice of bread. By the time your new instance is booted, configured, service-discovered, and finally “InService,” the spike in traffic has already come and gone, leaving you with a bigger bill and a cohort of very annoyed users.

It’s an expensive insurance policy

The ASG model is fundamentally wasteful. You run a “warm” fleet, paying for idle capacity just in case you need it. It’s like paying rent on a 5-bedroom house for your family of three, just in case 30 cousins decide to visit unannounced.

This “scale-up” model was slow, and the “scale-down” was even worse, riddled with fears of terminating the wrong instance and triggering a cascading failure. We ended up over-provisioning to avoid the pain of scaling, which completely defeats the purpose of “auto-scaling.”

The eager interns taking over the desk

So, the ASG has cleared out its desk. Who’s moving in? It turns out there’s a whole line of replacements, each one leaner, faster, and blissfully unconcerned with managing a “fleet.”

1. The appliance Fargate and Cloud Run

First up is the “serverless container”. This is the hyper-efficient new hire who just says, “Give me the Dockerfile. I’ll handle the rest.”

With AWS Fargate or Google’s Cloud Run, you don’t have a fleet. You don’t manage VMs. You don’t patch operating systems. You don’t even think about an instance. You just define a task, give it some CPU and memory, and tell it how many copies you want. It scales from zero to a thousand in seconds.

This is the appliance model. When you buy a toaster, you don’t worry about wiring the heating elements or managing its power supply. You just put in bread and get toast. Fargate is the toaster. The ASG was the “build-your-own-toaster” kit that came with a 200-page manual on electrical engineering.

Just look at the cognitive load. This is what it takes to get a basic ASG running via the CLI:

# The "Old Way": Just one of the many steps...
aws autoscaling create-auto-scaling-group \
    --auto-scaling-group-name my-legacy-asg \
    --launch-template "LaunchTemplateName=my-launch-template,Version='1'" \
    --min-size 1 \
    --max-size 5 \
    --desired-capacity 2 \
    --vpc-zone-identifier "subnet-0571c54b67EXAMPLE,subnet-0c1f4e4776EXAMPLE" \
    --health-check-type ELB \
    --health-check-grace-period 300 \
    --tag "Key=Name,Value=My-ASG-Instance,PropagateAtLaunch=true"

You still need to define the launch template, the subnets, the load balancer, the health checks…

Now, here’s the core of a Fargate task definition. It’s just a simple JSON file:

// The "New Way": A snippet from a Fargate Task Definition
{
  "family": "my-modern-app",
  "containerDefinitions": [
    {
      "name": "my-container",
      "image": "nginx:latest",
      "cpu": 256,
      "memory": 512,
      "portMappings": [
        {
          "containerPort": 80,
          "hostPort": 80
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "requiresCompatibilities": ["FARGATE"],
  "cpu": "256",
  "memory": "512"
}

You define what you need, and the platform handles everything else.

2. The extreme couponer Spot fleets

For workloads that are less “instant spike” and more “giant batch job,” we have the “optimized fleet”. This is the high-stakes, high-reward world of Spot Instances.

Spot used to be terrifying. AWS could pull the plug with two minutes’ notice, and your entire workload would evaporate. But now, with Spot Fleets and diversification, it’s the smartest tool in the box. You can tell AWS, “I need 1,000 vCPUs, and I don’t care what instance types you give me, just find the cheapest ones.”

The platform then builds a diversified fleet for you across multiple instance types and Availability Zones, making it incredibly resilient to any single Spot pool termination. It’s perfect for data processing, CI/CD runners, and any batch job that can be interrupted and resumed. The ASG was always too rigid for this kind of dynamic, cost-driven scaling.

3. The paranoid security guard MicroVMs

Then there’s the truly weird stuff: Firecracker. This is the technology that powers AWS Lambda and Fargate. It’s a “MicroVM” that gives you the iron-clad security isolation of a full virtual machine but with the lightning-fast startup speed of a container.

We’re talking boot times of under 125 milliseconds. This is for when you need to run thousands of tiny, separate, untrusted workloads simultaneously without them ever being able to see each other. It’s the ultimate “multi-tenant” dream, giving every user their own tiny, disposable, fire-walled VM in the blink of an eye.

4. The invisible platform Edge runtimes

Finally, we have the platforms that are so abstract they’re “scaled to invisibility”. This is the world of Edge. Think Lambda@Edge or CloudFront Functions.

With these, you’re not even scaling in a region anymore. Your logic, your code, is automatically replicated and executed at hundreds of Points of Presence around the globe, as close to the end-user as possible. The entire concept of a “fleet” or “instance” just… disappears. The logic scales with the request.

Life after the funeral. How to adapt

Okay, the eulogy is over. The ASG is in its rocking chair on the porch. What does this mean for us, the builders? It’s time to sort through the old belongings and modernize the house.

Go full Marie Kondo on your architecture

First, you need to re-evaluate. Open up your AWS console and take a hard look at every single ASG you’re running. Be honest. Ask the tough questions:

  • Does this workload really need to be stateful?
  • Do I really need VM-level control, or am I just clinging to it for comfort?
  • Is this a stateless web app that I’ve just been too lazy to containerize?

If it doesn’t spark joy (or isn’t a snowflake legacy app that’s impossible to change), thank it for its service and plan its migration.

Stop shopping for engines, start shopping for cars

The most important shift is this: Pick the runtime, not the infrastructure.

For too long, our first question was, “What EC2 instance type do I need?” That’s the wrong question. That’s like trying to build a new car by starting at the hardware store to buy pistons.

The right question is, “What’s the best runtime for my workload?”

  • Is it a simple, event-driven piece of logic? That’s a Function (Lambda).
  • Is it a stateless web app in a container? That’s a Serverless Container (Fargate).
  • Is it a massive, interruptible batch job? That’s an Optimized Fleet (Spot).
  • Is it a cranky, stateful monolith that needs a pet VM? Only then do you fall back to an Instance (EC2, maybe even with an ASG).

Automate logic, not instance counts

Your job is no longer to be a VM mechanic. Your team’s skills need to shift. Stop manually tuning desired_capacity and start designing event-driven systems.

Focus on scaling logic, not servers. Your scaling trigger shouldn’t be “CPU is at 80%.” It should be “The SQS queue depth is greater than 100” or “API latency just breached 200ms”. Let the platform, be it Lambda, Fargate, or a KEDA-powered Kubernetes cluster, figure out how to add more processing power.

Was it really better in the old days?

Of course, this move to abstraction isn’t without trade-offs. We’re gaining a lot, but we’re also losing something.

The gain is obvious: We get our nights and weekends back. We get drastically reduced operational overhead, faster scaling, and for most stateless workloads, a much lower bill.

The loss is control. You can’t SSH into a Fargate container. You can’t run a custom kernel module on Lambda. For those few, truly special, high-customization legacy workloads, this is a dealbreaker. They will be the ASG’s loyal companions in the retirement home.

But for everything else? The ASG is a relic. It was a brilliant, necessary solution for the problems of 2010. But the problems of 2025 and beyond are different. The cloud has evolved to scale logic, functions, and containers, not just nodes.

The king isn’t just dead. The very concept of a throne has been replaced by a highly efficient, distributed, and slightly impersonal serverless committee. And frankly, it’s about time.

October 24, 2025 by Cloud stuff DevOps stuff SRE stuff

When invisible limits beat warm Lambdas

My team had a problem. Or rather, we had a cause. A noble crusade that consumed our sprints, dominated our Slack channels, and haunted our architectural diagrams. We were on a relentless witch hunt for the dreaded Lambda cold start.

We treated those extra milliseconds of spin-up time like a personal insult from Jeff Bezos himself. We became amateur meteorologists, tracking “cold start storms” across regions. We had dashboards so finely tuned they could detect the faint, quantum flutter of an EC2 instance thinking about starting up. We proudly spent over $3,000 a month on provisioned concurrency¹, a financial sacrifice to the gods of AWS to keep our functions perpetually toasty.

We had done it. Cold starts were a solved problem. We celebrated with pizza and self-congratulatory Slack messages. The system was invincible.

Or so we thought.

The 2:37 am wake-up call

It was a Tuesday, of course. The kind of quiet, unassuming Tuesday that precedes all major IT disasters. At 2:37 AM, my phone began its unholy PagerDuty screech. The alert was as simple as it was terrifying: “API timeouts.”

I stumbled to my laptop, heart pounding, expecting to see a battlefield. Instead, I saw a paradox.

The dashboards were an ocean of serene green.

  • Cold starts? 0%. Our $3,000 was working perfectly. Our Lambdas were warm, cozy, and ready for action.
  • Lambda health? 100%. Every function was executing flawlessly, not an error in sight.
  • Database queries? 100% failure rate.

It was like arriving at a restaurant to find the chefs in the kitchen, knives sharpened and stoves hot, but not a single plate of food making it to the dining room. Our Lambdas were warm, our dashboards were green, and our system was dying. It turns out that for $3,000 a month, you can keep your functions perfectly warm while they helplessly watch your database burn to the ground.

We had been playing Jenga with AWS’s invisible limits, and someone had just pulled the wrong block.

Villain one, The great network card famine

Every Lambda function that needs to talk to services within your VPC, like a database, requires a virtual network card, an Elastic Network Interface (ENI). It’s the function’s physical connection to the world. And here’s the fun part that AWS tucks away in its documentation: your account has a default, region-wide limit on these. Usually around 250.

We discovered this footnote from 2018 when the Marketing team, in a brilliant feat of uncoordinated enthusiasm, launched a flash promo.

Our traffic surged. Lambda, doing its job beautifully, began to scale. 100 concurrent executions. 200. Then 300.

The 251st request didn’t fail. Oh no, that would have been too easy. Instead, it just… waited. For fourteen seconds. It was waiting in a silent, invisible line for AWS to slowly hand-carve a new network card from the finest, artisanal silicon.

Our “optimized” system had become a lottery.

  • The winners: Got an existing ENI and a zippy 200ms response.
  • The losers: Waited 14,000ms for a network card to materialize out of thin air, causing their request to time out.

The worst part? This doesn’t show up as a Lambda error. It just looks like your code is suddenly, inexplicably slow. We were hunting for a bug in our application, but the culprit was a bureaucrat in the AWS networking department.

Do this right now. Seriously. Open a terminal and check your limit. Don’t worry, we’ll wait.

# This command reveals the 'Maximum network interfaces per Region' quota.
# You might be surprised at what you find.
aws service-quotas get-service-quota \
  --service-code vpc \
  --quota-code L-F678F1CE

Villain two, The RDS proxy’s velvet rope policy

Having identified the ENI famine, we thought we were geniuses. But fixing that only revealed the next layer of our self-inflicted disaster. Our Lambdas could now get network cards, but they were all arriving at the database party at once, only to be stopped at the door.

We were using RDS Proxy, the service AWS sells as the bouncer for your database, managing connections so your Aurora instance doesn’t get overwhelmed. What we failed to appreciate is that this bouncer has its own… peculiar rules. The proxy itself has CPU limits. When hundreds of Lambdas tried to get a connection simultaneously, the proxy’s CPU spiked to 100%.

It didn’t crash. It just became incredibly, maddeningly slow. It was like a nightclub bouncer enforcing a strict one-in, one-out policy, not because the club was full, but because he could only move his arms so fast. The queue of connections grew longer and longer, each one timing out, while the database inside sat mostly idle, wondering where everybody went.

The humbling road to recovery

The fixes weren’t complex, but they were humbling. They forced us to admit that our beautiful, perfectly-tuned relational database architecture was, for some tasks, the wrong tool for the job.

  1. The great VPC escape
    For any Lambda that only needed to talk to public AWS services like S3 or SQS, we ripped it out of the VPC. This is Lambda 101, but we had put everything in the VPC for “security.” Moving them out meant they no longer needed an ENI to function. We implemented VPC Endpoints², allowing these functions to access AWS services over a private link without the ENI overhead.
  2. RDS proxy triage
    For the databases we couldn’t escape, we treated the proxy like the delicate, overworked bouncer it was. We massively over-provisioned the proxy instances, giving them far more CPU than they should ever need. We also implemented client-side jitter, a small, random delay before retrying a connection, to stop our Lambdas from acting like a synchronized mob storming the gates.
  3. The nuclear option DynamoDB
    For one critical, high-throughput service, we did the unthinkable. We migrated it from Aurora to DynamoDB. The hardest part wasn’t the code; it was the ego. It was admitting that the problem didn’t require a Swiss Army knife when all we needed was a hammer. The team’s reaction after the migration was telling: “Wait… you mean we don’t need to worry about connection pooling at all?” Every developer, after their first taste of NoSQL freedom.

The real lesson we learned

Obsessing over cold starts is like meticulously polishing the chrome on your car’s engine while the highway you’re on is crumbling into a sinkhole. It’s a visible, satisfying metric to chase, but it often distracts from the invisible, systemic limits that will actually kill you.

Yes, optimize your cold starts. Shave off those milliseconds. But only after you’ve pressure-tested your system for the real bottlenecks. The unsexy ones. The ones buried in AWS service quota pages and 5-year-old forum posts.

Stop micro-optimizing the 50ms you can see and start planning for the 14-second delays you can’t. We learned that the hard way, at 2:37 AM on a Tuesday.

¹ The official term for ‘setting a pile of money on fire to keep your functions toasty’.

² A fancy AWS term for ‘a private, secret tunnel to an AWS service so your Lambda doesn’t have to go out into the scary public internet’. It’s like an employee-only hallway in a giant mall.

October 10, 2025 by Cloud stuff DevOps stuff SRE stuff

Avoiding serverless chaos with 3 essential Lambda patterns

Your first Lambda function was a thing of beauty. Simple, elegant, it did one job and did it well. Then came the second. And the tenth. Before you knew it, you weren’t running an application; you were presiding over a digital ant colony, with functions scurrying in every direction without a shred of supervision.

AWS Lambda, the magical service that lets us run code without thinking about servers, can quickly devolve into a chaotic mess of serverless spaghetti. Each function lives happily in its own isolated bubble, and when demand spikes, AWS kindly hands out more and more bubbles. The result? An anarchic party of concurrent executions.

But don’t despair. Before you consider a career change to alpaca farming, let’s introduce three seasoned wranglers who will bring order to your serverless circus. These are the architectural patterns that separate the rookies from the maestros in the art of building resilient, scalable systems.

Meet the micromanager boss

First up is a Lambda with a clipboard and very little patience. This is the Command Pattern function. Its job isn’t to do the heavy lifting—that’s what the interns are for. Its sole purpose is to act as the gatekeeper, the central brain that receives an order, scrutinizes it (request validation), consults its dusty rulebook (business logic), and then barks commands at its underlings to do the actual work.

It’s the perfect choice for workflows where bringing in AWS Step Functions would be like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. It centralizes decision-making and maintains a crystal-clear separation between those who think and those who do.

When to hire this boss

  • For small to medium workflows that need a clear, single point of control.
  • When you need a bouncer at the door to enforce rules before letting anyone in.
  • If you appreciate a clean hierarchy: one boss, many workers.

A real-world scenario

An OrderProcessor Lambda receives a new order via API Gateway. It doesn’t trust anyone. It first validates the payload, saves a record to DynamoDB so it can’t get lost, and only then does it invoke other Lambdas: one to handle the payment, another to send a confirmation email, and a third to notify the shipping department. The boss orchestrates; the workers execute. Clean and effective.

Visually, it looks like a central hub directing traffic:

Here’s how that boss might delegate a task to the notifications worker:

// The Command Lambda (e.g., process-order-command)
import { LambdaClient, InvokeCommand } from "@aws-sdk/client-lambda";

const lambdaClient = new LambdaClient({ region: "us-east-1" });

export const handler = async (event) => {
    const orderDetails = JSON.parse(event.body);

    // 1. Validate and save the order (your business logic here)
    console.log(`Processing order ${orderDetails.orderId}...`);
    // ... logic to save to DynamoDB ...

    // 2. Delegate to the notification worker
    const invokeParams = {
        FunctionName: 'arn:aws:lambda:us-east-1:123456789012:function:send-confirmation-email',
        InvocationType: 'Event', // Fire-and-forget
        Payload: JSON.stringify({
            orderId: orderDetails.orderId,
            customerEmail: orderDetails.customerEmail,
        }),
    };

    await lambdaClient.send(new InvokeCommand(invokeParams));

    return {
        statusCode: 202, // Accepted
        body: JSON.stringify({ message: "Order received and is being processed." }),
    };
};

The dark side of micromanagement

Be warned. This boss can become a bottleneck. If all decisions flow through one function, it can get overwhelmed. It also risks becoming a “God Object,” a monstrous function that knows too much and does too much, making it a nightmare to maintain and a single, terrifying point of failure.

Enter the patient courier

So, what happens when the micromanager gets ten thousand requests in one second? It chokes, your system grinds to a halt, and you get a frantic call from your boss. The Command Pattern’s weakness is its synchronous nature. We need a buffer. We need an intermediary.

This is where the Messaging Pattern comes in, embodying the art of asynchronous patience. Here, instead of talking directly, services drop messages into a queue or stream (like SQS, SNS, or Kinesis). A consumer Lambda then picks them up whenever it’s ready. This builds healthy boundaries between your services, absorbs sudden traffic bursts like a sponge, and ensures that if something goes wrong, the message can be retried.

When to Call the Courier

  • For bursty or unpredictable workloads that would otherwise overwhelm your system.
  • To isolate slow or unreliable third-party services from your main request path.
  • When you need to offload heavy tasks to be processed in the background.
  • If you need a guarantee that a task will be executed at least once, with a safety net (a Dead-Letter Queue) for messages that repeatedly fail.

A Real-World Scenario

A user clicks “Checkout.” Instead of processing everything right away, the API Lambda simply drops an OrderPlaced event into an SQS queue and immediately returns a success message to the user. On the other side, a ProcessOrderQueue Lambda consumes events from the queue at its own pace. It reserves inventory, charges the credit card, and sends notifications. If the payment service is down, SQS holds the message, and the Lambda tries again later. No lost orders, no frustrated users.

The flow decouples the producer from the consumer:

The producer just needs to drop the message and walk away:

// The Producer Lambda (e.g., checkout-api)
import { SQSClient, SendMessageCommand } from "@aws-sdk/client-sqs";

const sqsClient = new SQSClient({ region: "us-east-1" });

export const handler = async (event) => {
    const orderDetails = JSON.parse(event.body);

    const command = new SendMessageCommand({
        QueueUrl: "[https://sqs.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/123456789012/OrderProcessingQueue](https://sqs.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/123456789012/OrderProcessingQueue)",
        MessageBody: JSON.stringify(orderDetails),
        MessageGroupId: orderDetails.orderId // For FIFO queues
    });

    await sqsClient.send(command);

    return {
        statusCode: 200,
        body: JSON.stringify({ message: "Your order is confirmed!" }),
    };
};

The price of patience

This resilience isn’t free. The biggest trade-off is added latency; you’re introducing an extra step. It also makes end-to-end tracing more complex. Debugging a journey that spans across a queue can feel like trying to track a package with no tracking number.

Unleash the Ttown crier

Sometimes, one piece of news needs to be told to everyone, all at once, without waiting for them to ask. You don’t want a single boss delegating one by one, nor a courier delivering individual letters. You need a proclamation.

The Fan-Out Pattern is your digital town crier. A single event is published to a central hub (typically an SNS topic or EventBridge), which then broadcasts it to any services that have subscribed. Each subscriber is a Lambda function that kicks into action in parallel, completely unaware of the others.

When to shout from the rooftops

  • When a single event needs to trigger multiple, independent downstream processes.
  • For building real-time, event-driven architectures where services react to changes.
  • In high-scale systems where parallel processing is a must.

A real-world scenario

An OrderPlaced event is published to an SNS topic. Instantly, this triggers multiple Lambdas in parallel: one to update inventory, another to send a confirmation email, and a third for the analytics pipeline. The beauty is that the publisher doesn’t know or care who is listening. You can add a fifth or sixth subscriber later without ever touching the original publishing code.

One event triggers many parallel actions:

The publisher’s job is delightfully simple:

// The Publisher Lambda (e.g., reservation-service)
import { SNSClient, PublishCommand } from "@aws-sdk/client-sns";

const snsClient = new SNSClient({ region: "us-east-1" });

export const handler = async (event) => {
    // ... logic to create a reservation ...
    const reservationDetails = {
        reservationId: "res-xyz-123",
        customerEmail: "jane.doe@example.com",
    };

    const command = new PublishCommand({
        TopicArn: "arn:aws:sns:us-east-1:123456789012:NewReservationsTopic",
        Message: JSON.stringify(reservationDetails),
        MessageAttributes: {
            'eventType': {
                DataType: 'String',
                StringValue: 'RESERVATION_CONFIRMED'
            }
        }
    });

    await snsClient.send(command);

    return { status: "SUCCESS", reservationId: reservationDetails.reservationId };
};

The dangers of a loud voice

With great power comes a great potential for a massive, distributed failure. A single poison-pill event could trigger dozens of Lambdas, each failing and retrying, leading to an invocation storm and a bill that will make your eyes water. Careful monitoring and robust error handling in each subscriber are non-negotiable.

Choosing your champions

There you have it: the Micromanager, the Courier, and the Town Crier. Three patterns that form the bedrock of almost any serverless architecture worth its salt.

  • Use the Command Pattern when you need a firm hand on the tiller.
  • Adopt the Messaging Pattern to give your services breathing room and resilience.
  • Leverage the Fan-Out Pattern when one event needs to efficiently kickstart a flurry of activity.

The real magic begins when you combine them. But for now, start seeing your Lambdas not as a chaotic mob of individual functions, but as a team of specialists. With a little architectural guidance, they can build systems that are complex, resilient, and, best of all, cause you far fewer operational headaches.

September 7, 2025 by Cloud stuff SRE stuff

Serverless without the wait

I once bought a five-minute rice cooker that spent four of those minutes warming up with a pathetic hum. It delivered the goods, eventually, but the promise felt… deceptive. For years, AWS Lambda felt like that gadget. It was the perfect kitchen tool for the odd jobs: a bit of glue code here, a light API there. It was the brilliant, quick-fire microwave of our architecture.

Then our little kitchen grew into a full-blown restaurant. Our “hot path”, the user checkout process, became the star dish on our menu. And our diners, quite rightly, expected it to be served hot and fast every time, not after a polite pause while the oven preheated. That polite pause was our cold start, and it was starting to leave a bad taste.

This isn’t a story about how we fell out of love with Lambda. We still adore it. This is the story of how we moved our main course to an industrial-grade, always-on stove. It’s about what we learned by obsessively timing every step of the process and why we still keep that trusty microwave around for the side dishes it cooks so perfectly. Because when your p95 latency needs to be boringly predictable, keeping the kitchen warm isn’t a preference; it’s a law of physics.

What forced us to remodel the kitchen

No single event pushed us over the edge. It was more of a slow-boiling frog situation, a gradual realization that our ambitions were outgrowing our tools. Three culprits conspired against our sub-300ms dream.

First, our traffic got moody. What used to be a predictable tide of requests evolved into sudden, sharp tsunamis during business hours. We needed a sea wall, not a bucket.

Second, our user expectations tightened. We set a rather tyrannical goal of a sub-300ms p95 for our checkout and search paths. Suddenly, the hundreds of milliseconds Lambda spent stretching and yawning before its first cup of coffee became a debt we couldn’t afford.

Finally, our engineers were getting tired. We found ourselves spending more time performing sacred rituals to appease the cold start gods, fiddling with layers, juggling provisioned concurrency, than we did shipping features our users actually cared about. When your mechanics spend more time warming up the engine than driving the car, you know something’s wrong.

The punchline isn’t that Lambda is “bad.” It’s that our requirements changed. When your performance target drops below the cost of a cold start plus dependency initialization, physics sends you a sternly worded letter.

Numbers don’t lie, but anecdotes do

We don’t ask you to trust our feelings. We ask you to trust the stopwatch. Replicate this experiment, adjust it for your own tech stack, and let the data do the talking. The setup below is what we used to get our own facts straight. All results are our measurements as of September 2025.

The test shape

  • Endpoint: Returns a simple 1 KB JSON payload.
  • Comparable Compute: Lambda set to 512 MB vs. an ECS Fargate container task with 0.5 vCPU and 1 GB of memory.
  • Load Profile: A steady, closed-loop 100 requests per second (RPS) for 10 minutes.
  • Metrics Reported: p50, p90, p95, p99 latency, and the dreaded error rate.

Our trusty tools

  • Load Generator: The ever-reliable k6.
  • Metrics: A cocktail of CloudWatch and Prometheus.
  • Dashboards: Grafana, to make the pretty charts that managers love.

Your numbers will be different. That’s the entire point. Run the tests, get your own data, and then make a decision based on evidence, not a blog post (not even this one).

Where our favorite gadget struggled

Under the harsh lights of our benchmark, Lambda’s quirks on our hot path became impossible to ignore.

  • Cold start spikes: Provisioned Concurrency can tame these, but it’s like hiring a full-time chauffeur to avoid a random 10-minute wait for a taxi. It costs you a constant fee, and during a real rush hour, you might still get stuck in traffic.
  • The startup toll: Initializing SDKs and warming up connections added tens to hundreds of milliseconds. This “entry fee” was simply too high to hide under our 300ms p95 goal.
  • The debugging labyrinth: Iterating was slow. Local emulators helped, but parity was a myth that occasionally bit us. Debugging felt like detective work with half the clues missing.

Lambda continues to be a genius for event glue, sporadic jobs, and edge logic. It just stopped being the right tool to serve our restaurant’s most popular dish at rush hour.

Calling in the heavy artillery

We moved our high-traffic endpoints to container-native services. For us, that meant ECS on Fargate fronted by an Application Load Balancer (ALB). The core idea is simple: keep a few processes warm and ready at all times.

Here’s why it immediately helped:

  • Warm processes: No more cold start roulette. Our application was always awake, connection pools were alive, and everything was ready to go instantly.
  • Standardized packaging: We traded ZIP files for standard Docker images. What we built and tested on our laptops was, byte for byte, what we shipped to production.
  • Civilized debugging: We could run the exact same image locally and attach a real debugger. It was like going from candlelight to a floodlight.
  • Smarter scaling: We could maintain a small cadre of warm tasks as a baseline and then scale out aggressively during peaks.

A quick tale of the tape

Here’s a simplified look at how the two approaches stacked up for our specific needs.

Our surprisingly fast migration plan

We did this in days, not weeks. The key was to be pragmatic, not perfect.

1. Pick your battles: We chose our top three most impactful endpoints with the worst p95 latency.

2. Put it in a box: We converted the function handler into a tiny web service. It’s less dramatic than it sounds.

# Dockerfile (Node.js example)
FROM node:22-slim
WORKDIR /usr/src/app

COPY package*.json ./
RUN npm ci --only=production

COPY . .

ENV NODE_ENV=production PORT=3000
EXPOSE 3000
CMD [ "node", "server.js" ]
// server.js
const http = require('http');
const port = process.env.PORT || 3000;

const server = http.createServer((req, res) => {
  if (req.url === '/health') {
    res.writeHead(200, { 'Content-Type': 'text/plain' });
    return res.end('ok');
  }

  // Your actual business logic would live here
  const body = JSON.stringify({ success: true, timestamp: Date.now() });
  res.writeHead(200, { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' });
  res.end(body);
});

server.listen(port, () => {
  console.log(`Server listening on port ${port}`);
});

3. Set up the traffic cop: We created a new target group for our service and pointed a rule on our Application Load Balancer to it.

{
  "family": "payment-api",
  "networkMode": "awsvpc",
  "cpu": "512",
  "memory": "1024",
  "requiresCompatibilities": ["FARGATE"],
  "executionRoleArn": "arn:aws:iam::987654321098:role/ecsTaskExecutionRole",
  "taskRoleArn": "arn:aws:iam::987654321098:role/paymentTaskRole",
  "containerDefinitions": [
    {
      "name": "app-container",
      "image": "[987654321098.dkr.ecr.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/payment-api:2.1.0](https://987654321098.dkr.ecr.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/payment-api:2.1.0)",
      "portMappings": [{ "containerPort": 3000, "protocol": "tcp" }],
      "environment": [{ "name": "NODE_ENV", "value": "production" }]
    }
  ]
}

4. The canary in the coal mine: We used weighted routing to dip our toes in the water. We started by sending just 5% of traffic to the new container service.

# Terraform Route 53 weighted canary
resource "aws_route53_record" "api_primary_lambda" {
  zone_id = var.zone_id
  name    = "api.yourapp.com"
  type    = "A"

  alias {
    name                   = aws_api_gateway_domain_name.main.cloudfront_domain_name
    zone_id                = aws_api_gateway_domain_name.main.cloudfront_zone_id
    evaluate_target_health = true
  }

  set_identifier = "primary-lambda-path"
  weight         = 95
}

resource "aws_route53_record" "api_canary_container" {
  zone_id = var.zone_id
  name    = "api.yourapp.com"
  type    = "A"

  alias {
    name                   = aws_lb.main_alb.dns_name
    zone_id                = aws_lb.main_alb.zone_id
    evaluate_target_health = true
  }

  set_identifier = "canary-container-path"
  weight         = 5
}

5. Stare at the graphs: For one hour, we watched four numbers like hawks: p95 latency, error rates, CPU/memory headroom on the new service, and our estimated cost per million requests.

6. Go all in (or run away): The graphs stayed beautifully, boringly flat. So we shifted to 50%, then 100%. The whole affair was done in an afternoon.

The benchmark kit you can steal

Don’t just read about it. Run a quick test yourself.

// k6 script (save as test.js)
import http from 'k6/http';
import { check, sleep } from 'k6';

export const options = {
  vus: 100,
  duration: '5m',
  thresholds: {
    'http_req_duration': ['p(95)<250'], // Aim for a 250ms p95
    'checks': ['rate>0.999'],
  },
};

export default function () {
  const url = __ENV.TARGET_URL || '[https://api.yourapp.com/checkout/v2/quote](https://api.yourapp.com/checkout/v2/quote)';
  const res = http.get(url);
  check(res, { 'status is 200': r => r.status === 200 });
  sleep(0.2); // Small pause between requests
}

Run it from your terminal like this:

k6 run -e TARGET_URL=https://your-canary-endpoint.com test.js

Our results for context

These aren’t universal truths; they are snapshots of our world. Your mileage will vary.

The numbers in bold are what kept us up at night and what finally let us sleep. For our steady traffic, the always-on container was not only faster and more reliable, but it was also shaping up to be cheaper.

Lambda is still in our toolbox

We didn’t throw the microwave out. We just stopped using it to cook the Thanksgiving turkey. Here’s where we still reach for Lambda without a second thought:

  • Sporadic or bursty workloads: Those once-a-day reports or rare event handlers are perfect for scale-to-zero.
  • Event glue: It’s the undisputed champion of transforming S3 puts, reacting to DynamoDB streams, and wiring up EventBridge.
  • Edge logic: For tiny header manipulations or rewrites, Lambda@Edge and CloudFront Functions are magnificent.

Lambda didn’t fail us. We outgrew its default behavior for a very specific, high-stakes workload. We cheated physics by keeping our processes warm, and in return, our p95 stopped stretching like hot taffy.

If your latency targets and traffic shape look anything like ours, please steal our tiny benchmark kit. Run a one-day canary. See what the numbers tell you. The goal isn’t to declare one tool a winner, but to spend less time arguing with physics and more time building things that people love.

September 2, 2025 by Cloud stuff DevOps stuff SRE stuff

What is AWS Nucleus, and why Is it poised to replace EC2?

It all started with a coffee and a bill. My usual morning routine. But this particular Tuesday, the AWS bill had an extra kick that my espresso lacked. The cost for a handful of m5.large instances had jumped nearly 40% over the past year. I almost spat out my coffee.

I did what any self-respecting Cloud Architect does: I blamed myself. Did I forget to terminate a dev environment? Did I leave a data transfer running to another continent? But no. After digging through the labyrinth of Cost Explorer, the truth was simpler and far more sinister: EC2 was quietly getting more expensive. Spot instances had become as predictable as a cat on a hot tin plate, and my “burstable” CPUs seemed to run out of breath if they had to do more than jog for a few minutes.

EC2, our old, reliable friend. The bedrock of the cloud. It felt like watching your trusty old car suddenly start demanding premium fuel and imported spare parts just to get to the grocery store. Something was off.

And then, it happened. A slip-up in a public Reddit forum. A senior AWS engineer accidentally posted a file named ec2-phaseout-q4–2027.pdf. It was deleted in minutes, but the internet, as we know, has the memory of an elephant with a grudge.

(Disclaimer for the nervous: This PDF is my narrative device. A ghost in the machine. A convenient plot twist. But the trends it points to? The rising costs, the architectural creaks? Those are very, very real. Now, where were we?)

The document was a bombshell. It laid out a plan to deprecate over 80% of current EC2 instance families by the end of 2027, paving the way for a “next-gen compute platform.” Was this real? I made some calls. The first partner laughed it off. The second went quiet, a little too quiet. The third, after I promised to buy them beers for a month, whispered: “We’re already planning the transition for our enterprise clients.”

Bingo.

Why our beloved EC2 is becoming a museum piece

My lead engineer summed it up beautifully last week. “Running real-time ML on today’s EC2,” he sighed, “feels like asking a 2010 laptop to edit 4K video. It’ll do it, but it’ll scream in agony the whole time, and you’d better have a fire extinguisher handy.”

He’s not wrong. For general-purpose apps, EC2 is still a trusty workhorse. But for the demanding, high-performance workloads that are becoming the norm? You can practically see the gray hairs and hear the joints creaking.

This isn’t just about cost. It’s about architecture. EC2 was built for a different era, an era before serverless was cool, before WebAssembly (WASM) was a thing, and before your toaster needed to run a Kubernetes cluster. The cracks are starting to show.

Meet AWS Nucleus, the secret successor

No press release. No re:Invent keynote. But if you’re connected to AWS insiders, you’ve probably heard whispers of a project internally codenamed “Nucleus.” We got access to this stealth-mode compute platform, and it’s unlike anything we’ve used before.

What does it feel like? Think of it this way: if Lambda and Fargate had a baby, and that baby was raised by a bare-metal server with a PhD in performance, you’d get Nucleus. It has the speed and direct hardware access of a dedicated machine, but with the auto-scaling magic of serverless.

Here are some of the early capabilities we’ve observed:

  • No more cold starts. Unlike Lambda, which can sometimes feel like it’s waking up from a deep nap.
  • Direct hardware access. Full control over GPU and SSD resources without the usual virtualization overhead.
  • Predictive autoscaling. It analyzes traffic patterns and scales before the spike hits, not during.
  • WASM-native runtime. Support for Node.js, Python, Go, and Rust is baked in from the ground up.

It’s not generally available yet, but internal teams and a select few partners are already building on it.

A 30-day head-to-head test

Yes, we triple checked those cost figures. Even if AWS adjusts the pricing after the preview, the efficiency gap is too massive to ignore.

Your survival guide for the coming shift

Let’s be clear, there’s no need to panic and delete all your EC2 instances. But if this memo is even half-right, you don’t want to be caught flat-footed in a few years. Here’s what we’re doing, and what you might want to start experimenting with.

Step 1: Become a cloud whisperer

Start by pinging your AWS Solutions Architect, not directly about “Nucleus,” but something softer:

“Hey, we’re exploring options for more performant, cost-effective compute. Are there any next-gen runtimes or private betas AWS is piloting that we could look into?”

You’ll be surprised what folks share if you ask the right way.

Step 2: test on the shadow platform

Some partners already have early access CLI builds. If you get your hands on one, you’ll notice some familiar patterns.

# Initialize a new service from a template
nucleus init my-api --template=fastapi

# Deploy with a single command
nucleus deploy --env=staging --free-tier

Disclaimer: Not officially available. Use in isolated test environments only. Do not run your production database on this.

Step 3: Run a hybrid setup

If you get preview access, try bridging the old with the new. Here’s a hypothetical Terraform snippet of what that might look like:

# Our legacy EC2 instance for the old monolith
resource "aws_instance" "legacy_worker" {
  ami           = "ami-0b5eea76982371e9" # An old Amazon Linux 2 AMI
  instance_type = "t3.medium"
}

# The new Nucleus service for a microservice
resource "aws_nucleus_service" "new_api" {
  runtime       = "go1.19"
  source_path   = "./app/api"
  
  # This is the magic part: linking to the old world
  vpc_ec2_links = [aws_instance.legacy_worker.id]
}

We ran a few test loads between legacy workers and the new compute, no regressions, and latency even dropped.

Step 4: Estimate the savings yourself

Even with preview pricing, the gap is noticeable. A simple Python script can give you a rough idea.

# Fictional library to estimate costs
import aws_nucleus_estimator

# Your current monthly bill for a specific workload
current_ec2_cost = 4200 

# Estimate based on vCPU hours and memory
# (These numbers are for illustration only)
estimated_nucleus_cost = aws_nucleus_estimator.estimate(
    vcpu_hours=1200, 
    memory_gb_hours=2400
)

print(f"Rough monthly savings: ${current_ec2_cost - estimated_nucleus_cost}")

This is bigger than just EC2

Let’s be honest. This shift isn’t just about cutting costs or shrinking cold start times. It’s about redefining what “compute” even means. EC2 isn’t being deprecated because it’s broken. It’s being phased out because modern workloads have evolved, and the old abstractions are starting to feel like training wheels we forgot to take off.

A broader pattern is emerging across the industry. What AWS is allegedly doing with Nucleus mirrors a larger movement:

  • Google Cloud is reportedly piloting a Cloud Run variant that uses a WASM-based runtime.
  • Microsoft Azure is quietly testing a system to blur the line between containers and functions.
  • Oracle, surprisingly, has been sponsoring development tools optimized for WASM-native environments.

The foundational idea is clear: cloud platforms are moving toward fast-boot, auto-scaling, WASM-capable compute that sits somewhere between Lambda and Kubernetes, but without the overhead of either.

Is EC2 the new legacy?

It’s strange to say, but EC2 is starting to feel like “bare metal” did a decade ago: powerful, essential, but something you try to abstract away.

One of our SREs shared this gem the other day:

“A couple of our junior engineers thought EC2 was some kind of disaster recovery tool for Kubernetes.”

That’s from a Fortune 100 company. When your flagship infrastructure service starts raising eyebrows from fresh grads, you know a generational shift is underway.

The cloud is evolving, again. But this isn’t a gentle, planned succession. It’s a Cambrian explosion in real-time. New, bizarre forms of compute are crawling out of the digital ooze, and the old titans, once thought invincible, are starting to look slow and clumsy. They don’t get a gold watch and a retirement party. They become fossils, their skeletons propping up the new world.

EC2 isn’t dying tomorrow. It’s becoming a geological layer. It’s the bedrock, the sturdy but unglamorous foundation upon which nimbler, more specialized predators will hunt. The future isn’t about killing the virtual machine; it’s about making it an invisible implementation detail. In the same way, most of us stopped thinking about the physical server racks in a data center, we’ll soon stop thinking about the VM. We’ll just care about the work that needs doing.

So no, EC2 isn’t dying. It’s becoming a legend. And in the fast-moving world of technology, legends belong in museums, admired from a safe distance.

August 11, 2025 by Cloud stuff DevOps stuff SRE stuff

The strange world of serverless data processing made simple

Data isn’t just “big” anymore. It’s feral. It stampedes in from every direction, websites, mobile apps, a million sentient toasters, and it rarely arrives neatly packaged. It’s messy, chaotic, and stubbornly resistant to being neatly organized into rows for analysis. For years, taming this digital beast meant building vast, complicated corrals of servers, clusters, and configurations. It was a full-time job to keep the lights on, let alone do anything useful with the data itself.

Then, the cloud giants whispered a sweet promise in our ears: “serverless.” Let us handle the tedious infrastructure, they said. You just focus on the data. It sounds like magic, and sometimes it is. But it’s a specific kind of magic, with its own incantations and rules. Let’s explore the fundamental principles of this magic through Google Cloud’s Dataflow, and then see how its cousins at Amazon, AWS Glue and AWS Kinesis, perform similar tricks.

The anatomy of a data pipeline

No matter which magical cloud service you use, the core ritual is always the same. It’s a simple, three-step dance.

  1. Read: You grab your wild data from a source.
  2. Transform: You perform some arcane logic to clean, shape, enrich, or otherwise domesticate it.
  3. Write: You deposit the now-tamed data into a sink, like a database or data warehouse, where it can finally be useful.

This sequence is called a pipeline. In the serverless world, the pipeline is not a physical thing but a logical construct, a recipe that tells the cloud how to process your data.

Shaping the data clay

Once data enters a pipeline, it needs to be held in something. You can’t just let it slosh around. In Dataflow, data is scooped into a PCollection. The ‘P’ stands for ‘Parallel’, which is a hint that this collection is designed to be scattered across many machines and processed all at once. A key feature of a PCollection is that it’s immutable. When you apply a transformation, you don’t change the original collection; you create a brand-new one. It’s like a paranoid form of data alchemy where you never destroy your original ingredients.

Over in the AWS world, Glue prefers to work with DynamicFrames. Think of them as souped-up DataFrames from the Spark universe, built to handle the messy, semi-structured data that Glue often finds in the wild. Kinesis Data Analytics, being a specialist in fast-moving data, treats data as a continuous stream that you operate on as it flows by. The concept is the same, an in-memory representation of your data, but the name and nuances change depending on the ecosystem.

The art of transformation

A pipeline without transformations is just a very expensive copy-paste command. The real work happens here.

Dataflow uses the Apache Beam SDK, a powerful, open-source framework that lets you define your transformations in Java or Python. These operations are fittingly called Transforms. The beauty of Beam is its portability; you can write a Beam pipeline and, in theory, run it on other platforms (like Apache Flink or Spark) without a complete rewrite. It’s the “write once, run anywhere” dream, applied to data processing.

AWS Glue takes a more direct approach. You can write your transformations using Spark code (Python or Scala) or use Glue Studio, a visual interface that lets you build ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) jobs by dragging and dropping boxes. It’s less about portability and more about deep integration with the AWS ecosystem. Kinesis Data Analytics simplifies things even further for its real-time niche, letting you transform streams primarily through standard SQL queries or, for more complex tasks, by using the Apache Flink framework.

Running wild and scaling free

Here’s the serverless punchline: you define the pipeline, and the cloud runs it. You don’t provision servers, patch operating systems, or worry about cluster management.

When you launch a Dataflow job, Google Cloud automatically spins up a fleet of worker virtual machines to execute your pipeline. Its most celebrated trick is autoscaling. If a flood of data arrives, Dataflow automatically adds more workers. When the flood subsides, it sends them away. For streaming jobs, its Streaming Engine further refines this process, making scaling faster and more efficient.

AWS Glue and Kinesis Data Analytics operate on a similar principle, though with different acronyms. Glue jobs run on a pre-configured amount of “Data Processing Units” (DPUs), which it can autoscale. Kinesis applications run on “Kinesis Processing Units” (KPUs), which also scale based on throughput. The core benefit is identical across all three: you’re freed from the shackles of capacity planning.

Choosing your flow batch or stream

Not all data processing needs are created equal. Sometimes you need to process a massive, finite dataset, and other times you need to react to an endless flow of events.

  • Batch processing: This is like doing all your laundry at the end of the month. It’s perfect for generating daily reports, analyzing historical data, or running large-scale ETL jobs. Dataflow and AWS Glue are both excellent at batch processing.
  • Streaming processing: This is like washing each dish the moment you’re done with it. It’s essential for real-time dashboards, fraud detection, and feeding live data into AI models. Dataflow is a streaming powerhouse. Kinesis Data Analytics is a specialist, designed from the ground up exclusively for this kind of real-time work. While Glue has some streaming capabilities, they are typically geared towards continuous ETL rather than complex real-time analytics.

Picking your champion

So, which tool should you choose for your data-taming adventure? It’s less about which is “best” and more about which is right for your specific quest.

  • Choose Google Cloud Dataflow if you value portability. The Apache Beam model is a powerful abstraction that prevents vendor lock-in and is exceptionally good at handling both complex batch and streaming scenarios with a single programming model.
  • Choose AWS Glue if your world is already painted in AWS colors. Its primary strength is serverless ETL. It integrates seamlessly with the entire AWS data stack, from S3 data lakes to Redshift warehouses, making it the default choice for data preparation within that ecosystem.
  • Choose AWS Kinesis Data Analytics when your only concern is now. If you need to analyze, aggregate, and react to data in milliseconds or seconds, Kinesis is the sharp, specialized tool for the job.

The serverless horizon

Ultimately, these services represent a fundamental shift in how we approach data engineering. They allow us to move our focus away from the mundane mechanics of managing infrastructure and toward the far more interesting challenge of extracting value from data. Whether you’re using Dataflow, Glue, or Kinesis, you’re leveraging an incredible amount of abstracted complexity to build powerful, scalable, and resilient data solutions. The future of data processing isn’t about building bigger servers; it’s about writing smarter logic and letting the cloud handle the rest.

June 8, 2025 by Cloud stuff

Why simplicity wins when you pick AWS ECS Fargate instead of EKS

Selecting the right tools often feels like navigating a crossroads. Consider planning a significant project, like building a custom home workshop. You could opt for a complex setup with specialized, industrial-grade machinery (powerful, flexible, demanding maintenance and expertise). Or, you might choose high-quality, standard power tools that handle 90% of your needs reliably and with far less fuss. Development teams deploying containers on AWS face a similar decision. The powerful, industry-standard Kubernetes via Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) beckons, but is it always the necessary path? Often, the streamlined native solution, Elastic Container Service (ECS) paired with its serverless Fargate launch type, offers a smarter, more efficient route.

AWS presents these two primary highways for container orchestration. EKS delivers managed Kubernetes, bringing its vast ecosystem and flexibility. It frequently dominates discussions and is hailed in the DevOps world. But then there’s ECS, AWS’s own mature and deeply integrated orchestrator. This article explores the compelling scenarios where choosing the apparent simplicity of ECS, particularly with Fargate, isn’t just easier; it’s strategically better.

Getting to know your AWS container tools

Before charting a course, let’s clarify what each service offers.

ECS (Elastic Container Service): Think of ECS as the well-designed, built-in toolkit that comes standard with your AWS environment. It’s AWS’s native container orchestrator, designed for seamless integration. ECS offers two ways to run your containers:

  • EC2 launch type: You manage the underlying EC2 virtual machine instances yourself. This gives you granular control over the instance type (perhaps you need specific GPUs or network configurations) but brings back the responsibility of patching, scaling, and managing those servers.
  • Fargate launch type: This is the serverless approach. You define your container needs, and Fargate runs them without you ever touching, or even seeing, the underlying server infrastructure.

Fargate: This is where serverless container execution truly shines. It’s like setting your high-end camera to an intelligent ‘auto’ mode. You focus on the shot (your application), and the camera (Fargate) expertly handles the complex interplay of aperture, shutter speed, and ISO (server provisioning, scaling, patching). You simply run containers.

EKS (Elastic Kubernetes Service): EKS is AWS’s managed offering for the Kubernetes platform. It’s akin to installing a professional-grade, multi-component software suite onto your operating system. It provides immense power, conforms to the Kubernetes standard loved by many, and grants access to its sprawling ecosystem of tools and extensions. However, even with AWS managing the control plane’s availability, you still need to understand and configure Kubernetes concepts, manage worker nodes (unless using Fargate with EKS, which adds its own considerations), and handle integrations.

The power of keeping things simple with ECS Fargate

So, what makes this simpler path with ECS Fargate so appealing? Several key advantages stand out.

Reduced operational overhead: This is often the most significant win. Consider the sheer liberation Fargate offers: it completely removes the burden of managing the underlying servers. Forget patching operating systems at 2 AM or figuring out complex scaling policies for your EC2 fleet. It’s the difference between owning a car, with all its maintenance chores, oil changes, tire rotations, and unexpected repairs, and using a seamless rental or subscription service where the vehicle is just there when you need it, ready to drive. You focus purely on the journey (your application), not the engine maintenance (the infrastructure).

Faster learning curve and easier management: ECS generally presents a gentler learning curve than the multifaceted world of Kubernetes. For teams already comfortable within the AWS ecosystem, ECS concepts feel intuitive and familiar. Managing task definitions, services, and clusters in ECS is often more straightforward than navigating Kubernetes deployments, services, pods, and the YAML complexities involved. This translates to faster onboarding and less time spent wrestling with the orchestrator itself. Furthermore, EKS carries an hourly cost for its control plane (though free tiers exist), an expense absent in the standard ECS setup.

Seamless AWS integration: ECS was born within AWS, and it shows. Its integration with other AWS services is typically tighter and simpler to configure than with EKS. Assigning IAM roles directly to ECS tasks for granular permissions, for instance, is remarkably straightforward compared to setting up Kubernetes Service Accounts and configuring IAM Roles for Service Accounts (IRSA) with an OIDC provider in EKS. Connecting to Application Load Balancers, registering targets, and pushing logs and metrics to CloudWatch often requires less configuration boilerplate with ECS/Fargate. It’s like your home’s electrical system being designed for standard plugs, appliances just work without needing special adapters or wiring.

True serverless container experience (Fargate): With Fargate, you pay for the vCPU and memory resources your containerized application requests, consumed only while it’s running. You aren’t paying for idle virtual machines waiting for work. This model is incredibly cost-effective for applications with variable loads, APIs that scale on demand, or batch jobs that run periodically.

Finding your route when ECS Fargate is the best fit

Knowing these advantages, let’s pinpoint the specific road signs indicating ECS/Fargate is the right direction for your team and application.

Teams prioritizing simplicity and velocity: If your primary goal is to ship features quickly and minimize the time spent on infrastructure management, ECS/Fargate is a strong contender. It allows developers to focus more on code and less on orchestration intricacies. It’s like choosing a reliable microwave and stove for everyday cooking; they get the job done efficiently without the complexity of a commercial kitchen setup.

Standard microservices or web applications: Many common workloads, like stateless web applications, APIs, or backend microservices, don’t require the advanced orchestration features or the specific tooling found only in the Kubernetes ecosystem. For these, ECS/Fargate provides robust, scalable, and reliable hosting without unnecessary complexity.

Deep reliance on the AWS ecosystem: If your application heavily leverages other AWS services (like DynamoDB, SQS, Lambda, RDS) and multi-cloud portability isn’t an immediate strategic requirement, ECS/Fargate’s native integration offers tangible benefits in ease of use and configuration.

Serverless-First architectures: For teams embracing a serverless mindset for event-driven processing, data pipelines, or API backends, Fargate fits perfectly. Its pay-per-use model and elimination of server management align directly with serverless principles.

Operational cost sensitivity: When evaluating the total cost of ownership, factor in the human effort. The reduced operational burden of ECS/Fargate can lead to significant savings in staff time and effort, potentially outweighing any differences in direct compute costs or the EKS control plane fee.

Acknowledging the alternative when EKS remains the champion

Of course, EKS exists for good reasons, and it remains the superior choice in certain contexts. Let’s be clear about when you need that powerful, customizable machinery.

Need for Kubernetes Standard/API: If your team requires the full Kubernetes API, needs specific Custom Resource Definitions (CRDs), operators, or advanced scheduling capabilities inherent to Kubernetes, EKS is the way to go.

Leveraging the vast Kubernetes ecosystem: Planning to use popular Kubernetes-native tools like Helm for packaging, Argo CD for GitOps, Istio or Linkerd for a service mesh, or specific monitoring agents designed for Kubernetes? EKS provides the standard platform these tools expect.

Existing Kubernetes expertise or workloads: If your team is already proficient in Kubernetes or you’re migrating existing Kubernetes applications to AWS, sticking with EKS leverages that investment and knowledge, ensuring consistency.

Hybrid or Multi-Cloud strategy: When running workloads across different cloud providers or in hybrid on-premises/cloud environments, Kubernetes (and thus EKS on AWS) provides a consistent orchestration layer, crucial for portability and operational uniformity.

Highly complex orchestration needs: For applications demanding intricate network policies (e.g., using Calico), complex stateful set management, or very specific affinity/anti-affinity rules that might be more mature or flexible in Kubernetes, EKS offers greater depth.

Think of EKS as that specialized, heavy-duty truck. It’s indispensable when you need to haul unique, heavy loads (complex apps), attach specialized equipment (ecosystem tools), modify the engine extensively (custom controllers), or drive consistently across varied terrains (multi-cloud).

Choosing your lane ECS Fargate or EKS

The key insight here isn’t about crowning one service as universally “better.” It’s about recognizing that the AWS container landscape offers different tools meticulously designed for different journeys. ECS with Fargate stands as a powerful, mature, and often much simpler alternative, decisively challenging the notion that Kubernetes via EKS should be the default starting point for every containerized application on AWS.

Before committing, honestly assess your application’s real complexity, your team’s operational capacity, and existing expertise, your reliance on the broader AWS vs. Kubernetes ecosystems, and your strategic goals regarding portability. It’s like packing for a trip: you wouldn’t haul mountaineering equipment for a relaxing beach holiday. Choose the toolset that minimizes friction, maximizes your team’s velocity, and keeps your journey smooth. Choose wisely.

April 28, 2025 by Cloud stuff DevOps stuff Kubernetes SRE stuff

Understanding AWS Lambda Extensions beyond the hype

Lambda extensions are fascinating little tools. They’re like straightforward add-ons, but they bring their own set of challenges. Let’s explore what they are, how they work, and the realities behind using them in production.

Lambda extensions enhance AWS Lambda functions without changing your original application code. They’re essentially plug-and-play modules, which let your functions communicate better with external tools like monitoring, observability, security, and governance services.

Typically, extensions help you:

  • Retrieve configuration data or secrets securely.
  • Send logs and performance data to external monitoring services.
  • Track system-level metrics such as CPU and memory usage.

That sounds quite useful, but let’s look deeper at some hidden complexities.

The hidden risks of Lambda Extensions

Lambda extensions seem simple, but they do add potential risks. Three main areas to watch carefully are security, developer experience, and performance.

Security Concerns

Extensions can be helpful, but they’re essentially third-party software inside your AWS environment. You’re often not entirely sure what’s happening within these extensions since they work somewhat like black boxes. If the publisher’s account is compromised, malicious code could be silently deployed, potentially accessing your sensitive resources even before your security tools detect the problem.

In other words, extensions require vigilant security practices.

Developer experience isn’t always a walk in the park

Lambda extensions can sometimes make life harder for developers. Local testing, for instance, isn’t always straightforward due to external dependencies extensions may have. This discrepancy can result in surprises during deployment, and errors that show up only in production but not locally.

Additionally, updating extensions isn’t always seamless. Extensions use Lambda layers, which aren’t managed through a convenient package manager. You need to track and manually apply updates, complicating your workflow. On top of that, layers count towards Lambda’s total deployment size, capped at 250 MB, adding another layer of complexity.

Performance and cost considerations

Extensions do not come without cost. They consume CPU, memory, and storage resources, which can increase the duration and overall cost of your Lambda functions. Additionally, extensions may slightly slow down your function’s initial execution (cold start), particularly if they require considerable initialization.

When to actually use Lambda Extensions

Lambda extensions have their place, but they’re not universally beneficial. Let’s break down common scenarios:

Fetching configurations and secrets

Extensions initially retrieve configurations quickly. However, once data is cached, their advantage largely disappears. Unless you’re fetching a high volume of secrets frequently, the complexity isn’t likely justified.

Sending logs to external services

Using extensions to push logs to observability platforms is practical and efficient for many use cases. But at a large scale, it may be simpler, and often safer, to log centrally via AWS CloudWatch and forward logs from there.

Monitoring container metrics

Using extensions for monitoring container-level metrics (CPU, memory, disk usage) is highly beneficial. While ideally integrated directly by AWS, for now, extensions fulfill this role exceptionally well.

Chaos engineering experiments

Extensions shine particularly in chaos engineering scenarios. They let you inject controlled disruptions easily. You simply add them during testing phases and remove them afterward without altering your main Lambda codebase. It’s efficient, low-risk, and clean.

The power and practicality of Lambda Extensions

Lambda extensions can significantly boost your Lambda functions’ abilities, enabling advanced integrations effortlessly. However, it’s essential to weigh the added complexity, potential security risks, and extra costs against these benefits. Often, simpler approaches, like built-in AWS services or standard open-source libraries, offer a smoother path with fewer headaches.
Carefully consider your real-world requirements, team skills, and operational constraints. Sometimes the simplest solution truly is the best one.
Ultimately, Lambda extensions are powerful, but only when used wisely.

March 19, 2025 by Cloud stuff DevOps stuff

Crucial AWS skills for developers in Cloud Computing

Cloud computing has transformed how applications are built and deployed, with AWS leading this technological revolution. For developers and architects, mastering essential AWS services is a competitive advantage and a necessity to thrive in today’s job market. This article will guide you through the key AWS skills you need to excel in cloud computing and fully leverage the opportunities this digital transformation offers.

AWS Lambda for serverless computing

AWS Lambda lets you execute your code in the cloud without worrying about server infrastructure. You run your code exactly when you need it, no more, no less. There’s no need to manage servers, maintain operating systems, or manually scale resources. AWS handles the heavy lifting behind the scenes, so you can concentrate on writing efficient code and solving meaningful problems. Lambda easily integrates with other AWS services, allowing you to create event-driven applications quickly and effectively.

Why You Should Learn It

  • Auto-Scaling: Automatically adjusts to demand.
  • Cost-Effective: Pay only for code execution time.
  • Microservices Friendly: Ideal for real-time events and modular architecture.

Essential Skills

  • Writing Lambda functions in Python or Node.js
  • Integrating Lambda with services like API Gateway, S3, and EventBridge
  • Optimizing for minimal latency and reduced costs

Real-world Examples

  • Backend API development
  • Real-time data processing
  • Task automation

Amazon S3 for robust cloud storage

Amazon S3 is an industry-standard storage solution known for its reliability, security, and scalability. Whether you’re managing small amounts of data or massive petabyte-scale datasets, S3 securely and efficiently handles your storage needs. Its seamless integration with other AWS services makes S3 indispensable for developers aiming to build anything from straightforward websites to complex analytics pipelines.

Why You Should Learn It

  • Exceptional Durability: Guarantees high-level data safety.
  • Flexible Storage Classes: Customizable based on performance and cost.
  • Advanced Security: Offers strong encryption and precise access management.

Common Use Cases

  • Hosting static websites
  • Data backups and archives
  • Multimedia content storage
  • Data lakes for analytics and machine learning

DynamoDB for powerful NoSQL databases

DynamoDB delivers ultra-fast database performance without management headaches. As a fully managed NoSQL service, DynamoDB effortlessly scales with your application’s changing needs. It handles heavy workloads with extremely low latency, providing developers with unmatched flexibility for managing structured and unstructured data. Its robust integration with other AWS services makes DynamoDB perfect for developing dynamic, high-performance applications.

Why It Matters

  • Fully Serverless: Zero server management required.
  • Dynamic Scaling: Automatically adjusts for varying traffic.
  • Superior Performance: Optimized for fast, consistent query results.

Critical Skills

  • Understanding NoSQL database concepts
  • Designing efficient data models
  • Leveraging indexes and DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) for enhanced query performance

Typical Applications

  • Gaming leaderboards
  • Real-time analytics
  • User session management

Effortless containers with AWS ECS and Fargate

Containers have revolutionized how we package and deploy applications, and AWS simplifies this process remarkably. Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS) allows straightforward orchestration and scaling of containerized applications. For those who prefer not to manage servers, AWS Fargate further streamlines the process by eliminating server management, freeing developers to focus purely on application development. ECS and Fargate combined allow developers to build, deploy, and scale modern applications rapidly and reliably.

Why It’s Essential

  • Managed Containers: No server maintenance headaches.
  • Automatic Scaling: Handles large-scale container deployments smoothly.
  • Serverless Deployment: Fargate simplifies your infrastructure workload.

Skills to Master

  • Building and deploying container images
  • ECS cluster management
  • Implementing serverless container solutions with Fargate

Common Uses

  • Deploying scalable web applications
  • Microservice-oriented architectures
  • Efficient batch processing

Automating infrastructure with AWS CloudFormation

AWS CloudFormation empowers you to automate and standardize infrastructure deployments through code. This ensures that every environment, be it development, staging, or production, is consistent, predictable, and reliable. Defining your infrastructure as code (IaC) reduces manual errors, saves time, and makes it easier to manage complex setups across multiple AWS accounts or regions.

Why You Need It

  • Clear Infrastructure Definitions: Simplifies complex setups into manageable code.
  • Deployment Consistency: Reduces errors and accelerates deployment.
  • Repeatable Deployments: Easily reproduce infrastructure setups anywhere.

Key Skills

  • Creating robust CloudFormation templates
  • Effectively managing stack lifecycles
  • Seamlessly integrating CloudFormation with other AWS services

Practical Scenarios

  • Quick setup of identical environments
  • Version control and management of infrastructure
  • Disaster recovery and multi-region infrastructure management

Boosting DynamoDB with AWS DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX)

AWS DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) significantly enhances DynamoDB’s performance by adding a fully managed in-memory caching layer. DAX dramatically improves application responsiveness and query speed, making it an excellent addition to high-performance applications. It seamlessly integrates with DynamoDB, requiring no complex configurations or adjustments, which means developers can rapidly enhance application performance with minimal effort.

Why You Should Learn DAX

  • Superior Performance: Greatly reduces response times for data access.
  • Fully Managed Service: Effortless setup with zero infrastructure hassle.

Ideal Use Cases

  • Real-time gaming scenarios
  • High-throughput web applications
  • Transactional systems needing fast responses

In a few words

Mastering these essential AWS services positions you at the forefront of cloud computing innovation. By deeply understanding these tools, you’ll confidently build scalable, resilient, and secure applications that not only perform exceptionally well but also optimize costs effectively. Staying proficient in these AWS technologies ensures you remain adaptable to the evolving demands of the tech industry, empowering you to create solutions that meet the complex challenges of tomorrow. Keep learning, exploring, and experimenting, your enhanced skillset will make you invaluable in any development or architecture role

March 16, 2025 by Cloud stuff DevOps stuff

Serverless mistakes that can ruin your architecture

Serverless architectures offer a compelling promise. They focus on business logic, not infrastructure. They scale automatically, simplify management, and can significantly reduce operational overhead. But over the years, as serverless technology evolved, certain initially appealing patterns revealed hidden pitfalls. Through my journey of building and refining serverless systems, I’ve uncovered a handful of common patterns you should reconsider or abandon altogether. Let’s explore these in detail to help you steer clear of similar mistakes.

Direct API Gateway integrations aren’t always better

Connecting API Gateway directly to services like DynamoDB or SQS, bypassing Lambda functions, initially sounds smart. It promises lower latency, less complexity, and reduced costs by eliminating the Lambda middleman. Who wouldn’t want quicker responses at lower costs?

However, this pattern quickly turns from friend to foe. Defining integration mappings is cumbersome and error-prone, and you lose the flexibility provided by Lambda. Complex mappings become challenging to test, troubleshoot, and maintain, especially when your requirements evolve. When something goes wrong, debugging can be painstaking because you lack detailed logging typically provided by Lambda.

Moreover, security and authorization quickly become complicated. Simple IAM-based authorization often proves insufficient, forcing you to revert to Lambda authorizers. Ultimately, what seemed like efficiency turns into a roadblock.

If your scenario truly is static, limited, and straightforward, a direct integration might work fine. But rarely does reality remain simple for long.

Monolithic Lambda Functions

Many developers, including me, started by creating monolithic Lambda functions that handle numerous API routes. It seemed practical, one deployment, easy management, and straightforward development experience, similar to using frameworks like FastAPI or Express. But as I learned, simplicity can mask significant drawbacks.

Here’s why monolithic Lambdas cause trouble:

  • Costly Resource Allocation: If a single API route requires more memory or CPU, every route inherits these increased resources. You end up paying more for all functions unnecessarily.
  • Security Risks: Broad permissions are needed, breaking AWS’s best practice of least privilege.
  • Scaling Issues: All paths scale equally, leading to inefficiencies when only specific paths experience heavy traffic.
  • Deployment Risks: An error or misconfiguration affects the entire service rather than just a single endpoint.

Breaking the giant Lambda into smaller, specialized micro-functions per API path provides precise control over scalability, security, cost, and memory usage. Each function’s settings can be tuned precisely, reducing costs and improving reliability. The micro-function approach may increase initial complexity slightly, but the long-term benefits greatly outweigh these costs.

Direct Lambda-to-Lambda invocations

Initially, invoking Lambda functions directly from other Lambdas via AWS SDK felt natural. I did it myself thinking it simplified communication between closely related tasks. However, experience showed me this pattern brings more headaches than benefits.

Here’s why:

  • Tight Coupling: Any change in the invoked Lambda’s name or deployment causes immediate breakage. That’s a fragile system.
  • Idle Waiting: In synchronous invocations, you pay for wasted compute time as one Lambda waits for another.
  • Complexity: Direct invocations bypass beneficial abstraction layers, making refactoring difficult.

Instead, adopt an event-driven approach using EventBridge or API Gateway. These intermediaries create loose coupling, facilitating easier scaling, error handling, and maintenance.

Putting everything inside the Handler

At first, writing all the code directly in the Lambda handler seems simpler, one file, fewer headaches. Unfortunately, simplicity fades quickly with complexity, leading to bloated handlers difficult to test, maintain, and debug.

Instead, structure your code logically:

  • Handler Layer: Initialization, input validation, error catching.
  • Business Logic Layer: Application-specific logic isolated from configuration and I/O concerns.
  • Data Access Layer (DAL): Abstracts interactions with databases or external services.

This architectural clarity dramatically simplifies unit testing, debugging, and refactoring. When changes inevitably come, you’ll thank yourself for not cutting corners.

Using EventBridge rules for scheduled tasks

AWS provides two methods for scheduling tasks through EventBridge, Rules and the newer Scheduler. Initially, Rules seemed convenient, especially because AWS never officially deprecated them. But sticking to rules can now be considered a missed opportunity.

Why prefer Scheduler over Rules?

  • Better Feature Set: Scheduler includes improved capabilities like one-time schedules, fine-grained control, and more intuitive management.
  • Scalability: Easier management at large scale.
  • Cost Optimization: Improved efficiency can lead to noticeable cost savings.

Simply put, adopting the newer EventBridge Scheduler positions your infrastructure to be future-proof.

Ignoring observability from the start

Early in my serverless journey, I underestimated observability. Logging seemed enough until it wasn’t. Observability isn’t just about logging errors; it’s about understanding your system thoroughly, from performance bottlenecks to tracing execution across multiple services.

Modern observability tools like AWS X-Ray, OpenTelemetry, and CloudWatch Logs Insights provide invaluable insight into your application’s behavior, especially in serverless environments where traditional debugging is less straightforward.

Integrating observability from day one may seem like overhead, but it significantly shortens troubleshooting and reduces downtime in production.

Final thoughts

Serverless architectures are transformative, but only when applied thoughtfully. The lessons shared here come from real-world experiences and occasional painful mistakes. By reflecting on these patterns and adapting your practices accordingly, you’ll save yourself future headaches and set your projects on a path toward greater flexibility, reliability, and maintainability. Remember, good architecture evolves through both wisdom and the humility to recognize and correct past mistakes.

March 15, 2025 by Cloud stuff DevOps stuff
NivelEpsilon
Exploring the Cloud: Insights into DevOps, Linux & Architectural Evolution