Choosing the right tool for continuous deployments is a big decision. It’s like picking the right vehicle for a road trip. Do you go for the thrill of a sports car or the reliability of a sturdy truck? In our world, the “cargo” is your application, and we want to ensure it reaches its destination smoothly and efficiently.
Two popular tools for this task are Helm and Kustomize. Both help you manage and deploy applications on Kubernetes, but they take different approaches. Let’s dive in, explore how they work, and help you decide which one might be your ideal travel buddy.
What is Helm?
Imagine Helm as a Kubernetes package manager, similar to apt or yum if you’ve worked with Linux before. It bundles all your application’s Kubernetes resources (like deployments, services, etc.) into a neat Helm chart package. This makes installing, upgrading, and even rolling back your application straightforward.
Think of a Helm chart as a blueprint for your application’s desired state in Kubernetes. Instead of manually configuring each element, you have a pre-built plan that tells Kubernetes exactly how to construct your environment. Helm provides a command-line tool, helm, to create these charts. You can start with a basic template and customize it to suit your needs, like a pre-fabricated house that you can modify to match your style. Here’s what a typical Helm chart looks like:
mychart/
Chart.yaml # Describes the chart
templates/ # Contains template files
deployment.yaml # Template for a Deployment
service.yaml # Template for a Service
values.yaml # Default configuration valuesHelm makes it easy to reuse configurations across different projects and share your charts with others, providing a practical way to manage the complexity of Kubernetes applications.
What is Kustomize?
Now, let’s talk about Kustomize. Imagine Kustomize as a powerful customization tool for Kubernetes, a versatile toolkit designed to modify and adapt existing Kubernetes configurations. It provides a way to create variations of your deployment without having to rewrite or duplicate configurations. Think of it as having a set of advanced tools to tweak, fine-tune, and adapt everything you already have. Kustomize allows you to take a base configuration and apply overlays to create different variations for various environments, making it highly flexible for scenarios like development, staging, and production.
Kustomize works by applying patches and transformations to your base Kubernetes YAML files. Instead of duplicating the entire configuration for each environment, you define a base once, and then Kustomize helps you apply environment-specific changes on top. Imagine you have a basic configuration, and Kustomize is your stencil and spray paint set, letting you add layers of detail to suit different environments while keeping the base consistent. Here’s what a typical Kustomize project might look like:
base/
deployment.yaml
service.yaml
overlays/
dev/
kustomization.yaml
patches/
deployment.yaml
prod/
kustomization.yaml
patches/
deployment.yamlThe structure is straightforward: you have a base directory that contains your core configurations, and an overlays directory that includes different environment-specific customizations. This makes Kustomize particularly powerful when you need to maintain multiple versions of an application across different environments, like development, staging, and production, without duplicating configurations.
Kustomize shines when you need to maintain variations of the same application for multiple environments, such as development, staging, and production. This helps keep your configurations DRY (Don’t Repeat Yourself), reducing errors and simplifying maintenance. By keeping base definitions consistent and only modifying what’s necessary for each environment, you can ensure greater consistency and reliability in your deployments.
Helm vs Kustomize, different approaches
Helm uses templating to generate Kubernetes manifests. It takes your chart’s templates and values, combines them, and produces the final YAML files that Kubernetes needs. This templating mechanism allows for a high level of flexibility, but it also adds a level of complexity, especially when managing different environments or configurations. With Helm, the user must define various parameters in values.yaml files, which are then injected into templates, offering a powerful but sometimes intricate method of managing deployments.
Kustomize, by contrast, uses a patching approach, starting from a base configuration and applying layers of customizations. Instead of generating new YAML files from scratch, Kustomize allows you to define a consistent base once, and then apply overlays for different environments, such as development, staging, or production. This means you do not need to maintain separate full configurations for each environment, making it easier to ensure consistency and reduce duplication. Kustomize’s patching mechanism is particularly powerful for teams looking to maintain a DRY (Don’t Repeat Yourself) approach, where you only change what’s necessary for each environment without affecting the shared base configuration. This also helps minimize configuration drift, keeping environments aligned and easier to manage over time.
Ease of use
Helm can be a bit intimidating at first due to its templating language and chart structure. It’s like jumping straight onto a motorcycle, whereas Kustomize might feel more like learning to ride a bike with training wheels. Kustomize is generally easier to pick up if you are already familiar with standard Kubernetes YAML files.
Packaging and reusability
Helm excels when it comes to packaging and distributing applications. Helm charts can be shared, reused, and maintained, making them perfect for complex applications with many dependencies. Kustomize, on the other hand, is focused on customizing existing configurations rather than packaging them for distribution.
Integration with kubectl
Both tools integrate well with Kubernetes’ command-line tool, kubectl. Helm has its own CLI, helm, which extends kubectl capabilities, while Kustomize can be directly used with kubectl via the -k flag.
Declarative vs. Imperative
Kustomize follows a declarative mode, you describe what you want, and it figures out how to get there. Helm can be used both declaratively and imperatively, offering more flexibility but also more complexity if you want to take a hands-on approach.
Release history management
Helm provides built-in release management, keeping track of the history of your deployments so you can easily roll back to a previous version if needed. Kustomize lacks this feature, which means you need to handle versioning and rollback strategies separately.
CI/CD integration
Both Helm and Kustomize can be integrated into your CI/CD pipelines, but their roles and strengths differ slightly. Helm is frequently chosen for its ability to package and deploy entire applications. Its charts encapsulate all necessary components, making it a great fit for automated, repeatable deployments where consistency and simplicity are key. Helm also provides versioning, which allows you to manage releases effectively and roll back if something goes wrong, which is extremely useful for CI/CD scenarios.
Kustomize, on the other hand, excels at adapting deployments to fit different environments without altering the original base configurations. It allows you to easily apply changes based on the environment, such as development, staging, or production, by layering customizations on top of the base YAML files. This makes Kustomize a valuable tool for teams that need flexibility across multiple environments, ensuring that you maintain a consistent base while making targeted adjustments as needed.
In practice, many DevOps teams find that combining both tools provides the best of both worlds: Helm for packaging and managing releases, and Kustomize for environment-specific customizations. By leveraging their unique capabilities, you can build a more robust, flexible CI/CD pipeline that meets the diverse needs of your application deployment processes.
Helm and Kustomize together
Here’s an interesting twist: you can use Helm and Kustomize together! For instance, you can use Helm to package your base application, and then apply Kustomize overlays for environment-specific customizations. This combo allows for the best of both worlds, standardized base configurations from Helm and flexible customizations from Kustomize.
Use cases for combining Helm and Kustomize
- Environment-Specific customizations: Use Kustomize to apply environment-specific configurations to a Helm chart. This allows you to maintain a single base chart while still customizing for development, staging, and production environments.
- Third-Party Helm charts: Instead of forking a third-party Helm chart to make changes, Kustomize lets you apply those changes directly on top, making it a cleaner and more maintainable solution.
- Secrets and ConfigMaps management: Kustomize allows you to manage sensitive data, such as secrets and ConfigMaps, separately from Helm charts, which can help improve both security and maintainability.
Final thoughts
So, which tool should you choose? The answer depends on your needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a comprehensive solution to package and manage complex Kubernetes applications, Helm might be the way to go. On the other hand, if you want a simpler way to tweak configurations for different environments without diving into templating languages, Kustomize may be your best bet.
My advice? If the application is for internal use within your organization, use Kustomize. If the application is to be distributed to third parties, use Helm.
